-
Devyn 2022-03-24 09:03:37
The charm of the original book is that its rich details make it very easy to bring yourself into the story. Even knowing the ending will not affect the charm of the story at all, because there are too many things that may happen before the ending is reached. But the movie loses this charm because of its limited length. For example, the battle of Rule 11 motion failed to show one percent of the wonderful book in the movie, and for example, the various arrangements during the settlement...
-
Erica 2022-03-23 09:03:17
Too pattern, too blunt. It's not really a success to adapt real events like...
-
Jovanny 2022-03-23 09:03:17
Too pattern, too blunt. It's not really a success to adapt real events like...
-
Erica 2022-03-21 09:03:17
Lawyers are neither evil liars nor omnipotent saviors. To a certain extent, they are just hired labor to help clients solve problems. It is a duty and a duty for him to do his duty faithfully, but it is not a sin if he is...
-
Yolanda 2022-03-21 09:03:17
In
class, why do I use this to write my... -
Marlin 2022-03-21 09:03:17
Justice has a price that not everyone can afford to pay. Courtroom is probably not the place to look for truth. Good personal injury lawyers are detached. Moreover, the ending shows us sometimes things work out not the way the lawyer planned it. You will Who did you choose to be in the...
-
Gracie 2022-03-21 09:03:17
Justice has a price that not everyone can afford to pay. Courtroom is probably not the place to look for truth. Good personal injury lawyers are detached. Moreover, the ending shows us sometimes things work out not the way the lawyer planned it. You will Who did you choose to be in the...
-
Jacques 2022-03-19 09:01:10
7/10. The main theme of the hero lawyer and the client, but the director did not regard the film as a tribute to the American dream, and tried his best to restore the complicated process of interviewing witnesses and pretrial conferences, which is very abnormal in fast-paced and entertaining Hollywood. On the other hand, the narrative method is too orthodox, and tends to be a legal education film. The audience is most concerned about how the protagonist who has no warm heart, no money and no...
-
Kianna 2022-03-18 09:01:09
The story is shot out of proportion. . So it seems verbose and...
-
Rogelio 2022-03-18 09:01:09
It is impossible to find the truth in court, what a lawyer should do is to seek mediation or justice. Many times the problem encountered is that it cannot be overcome with the law, but if you have the right belief, you are moving...
A Civil Action Comments
-
Theron 2022-03-15 09:01:10
not good-looking
Seeing that I can only use Douyin to maintain my mental state, it's really boring.
In their positions, judges are fair, lawyers benefit, and teachers impart knowledge.
Finally, I saw another evaluation of lawyers. Don't kidnap morally, don't scold lawyers with justice, this is just a job. I don't...
-
Beau 2022-01-27 08:21:09
For Law Seminar
Valuable from a cinematic perspective. The shot of the shot, the way the dialogue is presented. The plot design is very clever, and it is impossible to guess the final result. I love financial advisor~ the funniest part is: be brave, put your feet up~
show a lot. Social class, lawyer's moral...
-
Jan Schlichtmann: [siting in Skinner's chambers with William, Jerome present] This is the defendant's plan!
Judge Walter J. Skinner: No, it's my plan!
Jan Schlichtmann: It's Facher's plan, right from the beginning!
Judge Walter J. Skinner: It's my plan.
Jan Schlichtmann: [pointing at Jerome] He told me, he threatned me.
Judge Walter J. Skinner: IT'S MY PLAN!
-
Jan Schlichtmann: Do me a favour, Gordon, will you? Shut up.
James Gordon: [lying on the floor, from the majority of their furniture taken away for failure to pay their bills on time and in full] What?
Jan Schlichtmann: I'm so tired of hearing you moan about money all the time. This isn't about money anymore.
James Gordon: No?
Jan Schlichtmann: No.
James Gordon: What's it about? What's it about, Jan?
Bill Crowley: Look, let's all...
James Gordon: [stands up and walks over to Jan] No, I want to know. I want to know why I gave up my house for. My credit! My life! Would you take 10 million dollars right now?
Jan Schlichtmann: Yes.
James Gordon: But you won't take eight?
Jan Schlichtmann: No.
James Gordon: No. So at 10 million dollars this is some sort of uh... a, a mythic struggle but at eight it's just another lawsuit.
Jan Schlichtmann: If they're willing to pay eight, Gordon, then it's not enough, is it?
James Gordon: [sarcastically] Oh, that makes sense!
Jan Schlichtmann: It makes perfect sense.
James Gordon: [pacing back and forth] So, the only thing you accept is what they're not willing to give us. Listen to yourself! I for one am sick of listening to you. I've lost enough because of you.
Jan Schlichtmann: [shouting] You wouldn't have anything to lose it if it wasn't for me. Everything you have I got for you!
James Gordon: [emptying his pockets and throwing the items on Jan's table] I don't have anything, Jan! What do I have? I've got a couple of bucks and some, some bus transfers. I've got a saving account from when I was 12 years-old. Here! There's 37 dollars in here. With interest, after 25 years there's probably 47 dollars, take it! Add it to the war chest. Use it to fight injustice. Stand up for principles with that. Go down in flames with it for all I care. Only next time, "next time", that's a laugh - ask us if we want to go down with you!
