A King in New York Comments

Davon 2022-12-07 09:47:11

1. There is a problem with the translation of the title, it should be translated as "A King in New York". For all his own works that Chaplin starred in himself, the standard is guaranteed, just like Stephen Chow. If he only directs and does not act, the standard will be a little worse. 2. The director's political views are estimated to be expressed through the ten-year-old prodigy. After watching it, I felt no, the director just wanted to disgust the atmosphere at that...

Leanna 2022-11-17 02:01:02

A, #FIFF14NBCS#, although it is quite complicated, there are also many bright spots. There is a silent comedy in the middle, but Chaplin's character can't laugh, which is quite self-ironic. The latter part has suddenly become a political thriller comedy under the white terror, and the effect is not...

Ona 2022-11-12 22:26:38

One of Chaplin's less favorite works. The first half is a satire on the American television and advertising industry, and the second half uses the genius boy (the son of Chaplin in life) to express his political...

Brain 2022-10-14 06:14:42

Started to see all kinds of Chaplin. The stage spring and autumn made people feel Chaplin's successful transformation, this film,,, seems to have gone back again. . . . I don’t like Zhuo’s political films. The preaching taste is too strong. Most people who want to stir salt in the soup just let the salt float on the surface of the soup. The first sip is too salty and the second sip It's too light to reconcile. The comedy part occasionally reveals early aura, but the overall story is still too...

Thomas 2022-09-28 08:00:43

The film is divided into two parts: The first part is a comical satire, mocking modern American life, especially the rise of television. This part does not express opinions in a rational way. In the second part, from meeting a genius child, the ideology has a strong flavor, although there are two comedy gimmicks inserted in it, one is plastic surgery, the other is the child and the investigation committee. Analyzing the film from the perspective of plot or meaning alone seems...

Sam 2022-09-21 05:33:57

I watched the Chinese dubbing version, but the dubbing is very...

Halle 2022-09-20 01:25:43

Chaplin's final appearance on the screen is so sad, from the beginning of the sound film, the wide screen lament to the McCarthy victimization experience that takes a sharp turn. Although many passages feel the powerlessness of the film, it is not Chaplin's final complaint and farewell to everyone with his clumsy body in his screen...

Nella 2022-09-18 22:13:10

Although full of reflexive efforts and keeping up with generations, it still shows weakness and disconnection from time to...

Santos 2022-09-17 17:50:09

The old master of comedy is very personable, acting like a politician with impassioned speeches when he plays Hamlet, except that what he really wants to say is said through the mouth of a...

Arden 2022-09-09 09:15:03

Chaplin's masterpiece in his later years seems to be a response to a film considered by the US authorities to be GCD, and has been living in Switzerland since then. Not too funny not too ironic from a movie perspective, Chaplin is getting old,...