-
Joana 2023-09-29 14:47:25
Each small case continues to intensify the moral guilt of the protagonist and the audience until the final explosion. The moral boundary of lawyers is a topic that is still debated to this day, but the film is too politically inclined, and the Star Prison in New York in the 1970s was indeed overcrowded, which is very realistic. The women in the film are all functionalized, the motives of the characters are completely obscure, the shortcomings of that...
-
Rosalia 2023-09-28 23:48:22
So many good-looking actors, only Al Pacino in the 70s wants to sleep, I mean, I want to sleep and fall in love with Al Pacino in the...
-
Dakota 2023-09-14 03:22:44
Although the ending is guessed, the few tears of Lao Pa are really unexpected and make people angry I really don't know and have no idea, but Lao Pa's "roaring" scene is quite suitable at the end. Haha, how can the little lawyer be so soft and so...
-
Trycia 2023-08-26 16:41:37
There are many professions that are always facing moral judgments, and lawyers are undoubtedly the forefront of the storm. In the face of various criticisms of the judicial system and many unspeakable internal affairs, justice often lies in the choice of lawyers. Barry Levinson’s screenwriter is indeed full of tension, and the various foreshadowings in the front have been able to touch people’s hearts, and the final ending is slightly rushed, but still full of explosive power. I really like the...
-
Bret 2023-08-04 02:00:29
This film contributed: Al who was afraid of heights in a helicopter, Al who was drenched and shivering and drinking coffee, Al who was so wronged with rain, and Al who was as gentle as a sheep. If this is not the personal interest of the director, I would not believe...
-
Bridie 2023-07-26 22:32:16
Each small case continues to intensify the moral guilt of the protagonist and the audience until the final explosion. The moral boundary of lawyers is a topic that is still debated to this day, but the film is too politically inclined, and the Star Prison in New York in the 1970s was indeed overcrowded, which is very realistic. The women in the film are all functionalized, the motives of the characters are completely obscure, the shortcomings of that...
-
Elza 2023-07-25 21:57:10
AP's solo show, one step away from the...
-
Mylene 2023-07-22 20:22:53
Now it seems to be a very bold legal movie, exposing the chaos and ugly nature of the court in that era. I wonder if it was so bold and disregarding taboos in that era. And what the film revealed, still...
-
Darron 2023-06-10 07:59:37
We need justice, we need a sense of justice, because of the recent Kris Wu incident, I'm going to add one more star, even if the ending AI rant is so idealistic, but I like the ending, the sense of justice that breaks with the dirty...
-
Joaquin 2023-05-14 04:45:32
The power of a few idealists against the dirty system is too small, and the fairness and justice of the society have long been occupied by the voice...
And Justice for All Comments
-
Katrine 2022-05-01 06:01:05
What justice lawyers need
Loyal to the profession, the interests of the client are still loyal to the fairness and justice in the heart. Under the lawyer system, there is always an unsolvable problem.
Before watching the movie, I always insisted in my heart that lawyers should be loyal to their clients, but now I am not so...
-
Oliver 2022-05-01 06:01:05
Deliver justice-realism knows how to strike
1. At the beginning, the children slurred the "Justice for All" oath, and the whole film shows the chaos and utility of the legal system-judges and society full of prejudice, lawyers vying for fame, no The feeling committee... seems to tell the audience every moment: only innocent children will...
-
[Judge Rayford fires a gun in his courtroom, drawing attention]
Judge Rayford: Gentlemen, need I remind you you're in a court of law?
-
[Officer Leary is on the witness stand]
Officer Leary: I told him to move on, but he continued to use profanity and he refused to leave the premises.
Judge Rayford: What sort of profanity?
Officer Leary: You know, the normal kind.
Judge Rayford: Officer Leary, we've all heard these words before, now for the record what did he say?
Officer Leary: [uncomfortably] He used... "fuck" a lot.
[quiet laughter from the gallery]
Officer Leary: ..."piss on you"...
[more laughter]
Officer Leary: ...then said he was gonna... "bung-hole the short order chef"... "cream on the waitress"...
[more laughter]
Officer Leary: ...stuff like that, Your Honor.
Dapper Defendant: There's a very good reason for all of that, Your Honor.
Judge Rayford: Oh? What is that?
Dapper Defendant: I'm a diabetic.
[loud laughter from the gallery]
Judge Rayford: I fail to see the connection. I've never heard of diabetes causing foul language!
Dapper Defendant: That's because you're a douchebag.
[entire courtroom erupts into laughter, including Officer Leary before he catches himself and forces a poker face]