-
Kaci 2022-04-23 07:01:16
Although the special effects of "Gravity" did not bring people the immersive space experience, Ron Howard's perfect grasp of rhythm allowed the audience to relive this heart-wrenching scene in aerospace history. What is even more commendable is that Horner's soundtrack is not inferior to his other classic "Braveheart" of the same year, and many passages can still see the shadow of the later...
-
Federico 2022-04-23 07:01:16
Looking back at the movie now, it feels like the story, the narrative is slightly better than gravity. Possibly because of an adaptation of real events. But the graphics, photography and special effects were left...
-
Jovanny 2022-04-23 07:01:16
There is no doubt that it is a good film, but this film that I watched after watching Gravity is completely impossible to look directly at. ....
-
Robb 2022-04-22 07:01:03
The film from more than ten years ago still seems very flavorful~~ I revisited it again in CHC HD over the weekend, very good...
-
Percival 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Ron Howard is the best director of this generation in genre-level, emotional and material control. Appropriate staring, loss, tension, despair, sensationalism, family, using dialogues with different characters to convey information (to avoid boredom), just some small survival points to arrange an excellent drama segment (CO2 section), line details There are many details in the performance, and the humanistic care is full. What's more, this is the CG technology of 1995, which is amazing. The...
-
Jannie 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Miracle, this is a miracle that actually happened. After the ship exploded, I couldn't imagine them coming back safely. In space, for a spaceship independent of nothingness, oxygen, fuel, power, cold, water, and carbon dioxide are all deadly. Except for the only correct operation, any mistake will only lead to the abyss of doom. With the efforts of thousands of people, danger was saved. It turns out that reality is sometimes more powerful than science...
-
Retta 2022-04-22 07:01:03
"The successful failure." It's so heart-wrenching, even more so than watching "The Martian", because it's true, especially the two paragraphs of Fra Mauro and manual course correction in space. The situation that was not predicted by the simulation countless times, I admire those quick-witted scientists who respond at the speed of light on the spot, and also admire the calm and airy Ed Harris❤ (who is he playing? = =|| Oh director sb.) The more sci-fi sighs Is it because TV stations no longer...
-
Ned 2022-04-22 07:01:03
So I looked back and glanced at the introduction. Apollo 13 was launched in 1970, which means that in the next 50 years, human beings have regressed more and more, and the romance and courage have passed away. I wonder if this is a...
-
Nicklaus 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Strong main theme ~ but... so...
-
Martina 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Back then, merchants often used this film as a vcd test...
Apollo 13 Comments
-
Brent 2021-10-20 17:24:13
Apollo 13
"Apollo 13" is adapted from real events, and it is a "documentary" style. It basically restores the process of the events at that time to the greatest extent. It is also because the degree of restoration is too high, which brings a little difficulty to my viewing. I understand that it takes a...
-
Lottie 2021-10-20 17:23:46
"American Theme Movie"?
Although there are many movies that have changed based on the truth, it is very rare for a film to advertise itself as a "documentary" like "Apollo 13". (After all, it is difficult to find a step-by-step rigor than space flight in this world, and there is never a lack of material for dramatic...
-
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: Ken, glad you're here. You know what's going on?
Ken Mattingly: Uh, John's brought me up to speed. What do we have left in the batteries?
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: We don't really know.
Ken Mattingly: Well, we gotta get started on some shortcuts for power-up.
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: Yeah. You know how short?
Ken Mattingly: Well, it's all in the sequencing, John. If we can skip what we don't absolutely need and turn things on in the right order, maybe...
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: I agree.
Ken Mattingly: You started on a procedure?
John Aaron, EECOM Arthur: Well, the engineers have tried, but, I mean, it's your ship. We gotta get you in there.
Ken Mattingly: Okay. Frank, I need the sim cold and dark. Give me the exact same conditions they've got in there now. And I need, uh, present status of every instrument.
Frank Borman: You got it.
Ken Mattingly: I need a flashlight.
[one is offered]
Ken Mattingly: That's not what they have up there. Don't give me anything they don't have on board.
-
Fred Haise, Sr.: Oh, Christ.
Jack Swigert: What's up?
Jim Lovell: No more waste dumps. We're just gonna have to store it.