-
Kurt 2022-03-25 09:01:06
Low cost, good script, the beginning of Ray Milland's villain. On December 5, 2013, I re-watched the Blu-ray 3D version at the "Inverse Function International Studios" of the inverse function without slipping. The dual-camera is excellent, the brightness is up to standard, and the stereo effect in the 1950s is better than I imagined, especially the title subtitles and the special giant phone. Models are highlighting the effect. The placement of camera positions and indoor small objects is also...
-
Erna 2022-03-24 09:01:36
One by one, it's wonderful. Even such a foolish lover can guess the whole plan. Couldn't the detective have known it earlier? In fact, the most pitiful is the dead killer, who was followed inexplicably, hired as a killer, and had to complete such a difficult murder. In the end, he was killed if the murder...
-
Shaina 2022-03-24 09:01:36
The films of the 1950s are meticulous, and you can't find flaws from beginning to end. And because of the age, there can be clues such as keys that seem impossible now, so the new version of the remake is obviously...
-
Citlalli 2022-03-24 09:01:36
It's so classic, it's just a scene with five actors, and it's a plot propped up by dialogue. The reasoning is rigorous and always captivating. The male protagonist is defeated by his own cleverness. If I never thought that it would be the key to SWAN. It's a pity that the protagonist only thought of this, and did not expect the detective to take advantage of...
-
Shanon 2022-03-24 09:01:36
As long as the general people's bureaus are carefully investigated, there will definitely be loopholes found. Except for the Feixian Bureau. However, the detective's evidence collection method is very illegal this time, so the defendant will be...
-
Margret 2022-03-24 09:01:36
Hearty, in one go, the whole film is dominated by dialogue, the murder plan and reasoning process are extremely exciting, an imperfect murder almost achieved a perfect murder in another sense, the male protagonist Ray Milland played very vivid, Grace Kelly Moderate. Sr. Alfred's location this cameo is so...
-
Mohamed 2022-03-24 09:01:36
Absolute child. And being the first to be disgusted by the hot comment, will my wife be killed if she cheats? No wonder there are so many murders. According to this, so many cockroaches and ladybugs should be chopped...
-
Estell 2022-03-24 09:01:36
Just like a dissertation on mise-en-scene and suspension of disbelief, the more ingenious and cunning, the more inconceivable on paper, but the more fake it is, all of which Hitchcock let us...
-
Keely 2022-03-24 09:01:36
The strong has its own strong hand, and finally the detective combed the mustache and let me play a...
-
Sincere 2022-03-23 09:01:40
❶Anti-routine - the plan can't keep up with the changes, adapt to the situation, and catch the previous script; It's copied, it can be borrowed, but it can't be made up by the audience's own brains), which leads to unfinished endings; ❸Unfortunately, it didn't break the rules to the end - Tony noticed the trap and got away with it. His indifference to drinking after the crime was revealed made up for this a...
Dial M for Murder Comments
-
Destinee 2022-03-22 09:01:34
Favorite Hitchcock movie, bar none
For the super handsome male protagonist, but also to give a five-star. And the brain structure that can come up with a fairly perfect countermeasure in a short period of time after the plan has gone off track is amazing.
The fat old man plays the detective himself, which should be the film... -
Dee 2022-03-20 09:01:34
if there was a perfect crime
My wife betrayed me.
She dated, corresponded, and kissed a man named Mark. By chance, I followed her and saw her and Mark cooking macaroni in Chaishi's studio, very loving.
-
Margot Mary Wendice: Anyone would have realized he was dead. Just one look at those staring eyes...
Chief Insp. Hubbard: So you did see his face, after all.
Margot Mary Wendice: I saw his eyes! I can't remember his face!
-
Tony Wendice: What makes you think he came in by this door?
Chief Insp. Hubbard: His shoes.
Tony Wendice: His shoes?
Chief Insp. Hubbard: The ground was soaking wet last night. If he'd come in by the garden, he'd have left mud all over the carpet. As it is, he didn't leave any marks at all, because he wiped his shoes on the front doormat.
Tony Wendice: How can you tell?
Chief Insp. Hubbard: It's a fairly new mat, and some of its fibers came off on his shoes.
Tony Wendice: Oh, but surely...
Chief Insp. Hubbard: And there was a small tar stain on the mat, and some of the fibers show that as well. There is no question about it.
