Funny Games Comments

  • Ernestina 2022-03-26 09:01:07

    Perhaps the most immediate intention of Haneke's early films is to challenge and offend the audience, especially when the villain looks directly at the camera and speaks to the audience, the director is reminding the audience "I'm showing what the evil of human nature can reach. degree”, which not only challenges the audience’s moral bottom line, but also challenges their perception of human nature. One of the two villains belongs to the dominant type and the other belongs to the submissive...

  • Gennaro 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    A hypothesis that does not exist, and if the hypothesis does exist, the dead, as it should be. If this movie is a metaphor, isn't the whole society a fun...

  • Ryley 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    Hate the atmosphere that has been depressing all the...

  • Jamarcus 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    Personally, I think this is Haneke's work second only to The White Ribbon. The later almost intact American version of the self-remake is just as...

  • Everett 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    Reasoning with a pervert is no different than playing the piano to a donkey, and using violence to control violence is the highest. (Arno Frisch vs...

  • Roslyn 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    Really unconventional. I don't appreciate it, I can only admit that Haneke's skills are not...

  • Laura 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    Archives 2013.3.28.7pm The two murderers are the audience and the screenwriter who executes the audience's wishes. The usual scene endings of crime films (good guys turn around in a short period of time) are removed, and the audience's true desires are mercilessly exposed ( All you want to see is brutal murder). In fact, films such as Hitchcock (such as "Psycho") have always done this, but they are often reluctant to be so thorough. Comparable to "Straw Dog" and "A Clockwork...

  • Stevie 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    When the lethality of violent media is weakened, the pain of watching others seems to be out of the way, and some of the rewinding Master Ha played with the audience. long shoot. The end is an endless loop again. The last shot can be connected to the new version of his later remake, and every viewer at this time may be the next one to enter the shot @Film...

  • Raleigh 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    fooling around. If you're writing about the middle class, it's something Chabrol has written badly, and if you're playing with narrative structure, it's pretty rudimentary and pointless. This is the practice of forcibly pulling the audience into violent acts without giving any explanation, showing unbeautiful violence, and forcing the audience to become accomplices, which is very...

  • Percy 2022-03-24 09:02:16

    It is almost the whole process of doing evil to the audience, and there is no soothing space reserved in his other movies. All the turning points are blind tricks, because it only cares about the progress of the fancy game, and the absolute control of the perpetrator is also what the movie leaves. The impression given to the audience that we should have foreseen the outcome of being thoroughly toyed with. More importantly, this film that presents evil is less about criticizing the villain and...

Extended Reading
  • Jana 2021-12-31 08:02:31

    The fun of horror as a game

    Haneke is a cool director, and the coolest thing about him is his presentation of violence. It's different from Hollywood's direct and rudeness, but it is expressed in an imaginative and indirect way, which makes people even more terrifying after the brain is filled.

    Whether it is his best "White...

  • Laverna 2021-12-31 08:02:31

    Real Violence Documentary

    Simple unmotivated crimes don't have too many straightforward and bloody scenes. The indirect performance (the yelling of others) used at the moment of death of the three people can make people extremely uneasy. In gangster movies or other movies, the scenes of blood spurting, physical disability,...

Funny Games quotes

  • [subtitled version]

    Paul: [talking to the viewers, breaking the fourth wall] You're on their side, aren't you? So, who will you bet with?

  • [subtitled version]

    Georg: Why are you doing this to us?

    Paul: Why not?