-
Verda 2022-04-22 07:01:41
A very ordinary but very prophetic movie so far, a group of actors with superb acting...
-
Kyle 2022-04-22 07:01:41
The degree of completion is high, and the lines smoothly complete the passage of the bridge and the emotion, so after some clips, Poitier Chuckle waved his finger as a design to end a dialogue, which is lazy for the screenwriter (or deliberately catered to the audience's discriminatory mentality). for that?). American films that promote racial equality should be classified as political films. For a moment or two, I really thought there was no discrimination in the...
-
Hannah 2022-04-21 09:02:51
Oh dear, let's kill the...
-
Kacie 2022-04-21 09:02:51
Black and white matching was a rare thing in those days. It's easy to say that there is no discrimination, but it's different when it really happens at home. Three great empresses with superb acting...
-
Omari 2022-04-21 09:02:51
3.5, the film shows the racial issue in the 1960s. The black and white love hit a wall for this, and in the end everything has to give way to love. Although this kind of treatment is beautiful, it is still too idealistic. It is an important highlight moment. Whether it can be convincing or not depends on the performance of the old...
-
Macey 2022-04-21 09:02:51
It is possible to be fair and just when it is not about oneself, but it is difficult to be so objective when it is really involved. What's surprising is not that it's as simple as climbing up and down, but the fact that the two camps never seem to interact with each other. It is commendable that black boys are so good, kind and considerate of others. The great harmony in the world is that mothers are more understanding or more inclined to think about their children, while fathers are mostly...
-
Sid 2022-04-21 09:02:51
A very good third act, every dialogue can be thought-provoking. Concept-first makes the dramatic conflict seem deliberate, but the long monologue at the end of the white father is really good. The 1967 film, a lot of preview...
-
Braxton 2022-04-21 09:02:51
Sidney Poitier is dead handsome. ....
-
Georgianna 2022-04-21 09:02:51
Movies I don't like. The setting of making a decision a day ago is very idiotic, it only makes people feel that my daughter is too brainless, and I can't wait to let her experience the whipping of...
-
Opal 2022-04-21 09:02:51
The film produced by Columbia Company tells the story of a white female Joey who was on vacation in Hawaii, met a black doctor John and fell in love. Joey recommended John to his parents and family without any hesitation. In fact, the heart is also constantly fluctuating, but as the conversation with John gradually accepts John, this film reflects the story of the intermarriage of white people and black people in an era of serious racial discrimination!...
Guess Who's Coming to Dinner Comments
-
Madelyn 2022-01-07 15:52:51
Coincident but Exciting
Racial discrimination, which is a problem not only in the past but also at present and maybe in the future, is destined to be a hot topic at any time. Actually, the film itself was also an action against racial discrimination. Sidney Poitier, the hero in the film, who was a giant black star at that...
-
Jeromy 2022-01-07 15:52:51
"Guess Who's Coming to Dinner": The first black-and-white kiss shot in the history of a great movie with lofty ideals
In 1967, the film "Guess Who Will Eat Dinner" directed by director Stanley Kramer first explored the issue of race and marriage. The main plot of the film takes place indoors, the editing is smooth and powerful, and the plot is step by step. The technique and meaning will not lose its brilliance...
Guess Who's Coming to Dinner quotes
-
Joanna Drayton: He thinks you're gonna faint because he's a Negro.
Christina Drayton: Well... I don't think I'm going to faint, but I'll sit down anyway.
-
Christina Drayton: [to her assistant, Hilary, in the driveway] Now I have some instructions for you. I want you to go straight back to the gallery - Start your motor - When you get to the gallery tell Jennifer that she will be looking after things temporarily, she's to give me a ring if there's anything she can't deal with herself. Then go into the office, and make out a check, for "cash," for the sum of $5,000. Then carefully, but carefully Hilary, remove absolutely everything that might subsequently remind me that you had ever been there, including that yellow thing with the blue bulbs which you have such an affection for. Then take the check, for $5,000, which I feel you deserve, and get - permanently - lost. It's not that I don't want to know you, Hilary - although I don't - it's just that I'm afraid we're not really the sort of people that you can afford to be associated with.
[Hilary opens her mouth to say something]
Christina Drayton: Don't speak, Hilary, just... go.
Director: Stanley Kramer
Language: English Release date: December 12, 1967