-
Larissa 2022-04-24 07:01:11
Minus one star for plot, minus one star for special effects (obvious green screen), minus one star for logic, minus one star for Xiaoqiang's face and voice, plus extra points for sound...
-
Timmy 2022-04-24 07:01:11
Ugly enough. Is it interesting that Paul WS Anderson is always concocting such vulgar "blockbusters"? A hodgepodge of plots, and he wants to make a volcano eruption version of Titanic, right? As a result, the quality of the film and the box office were washed away by volcanic magma. The two main characters, Kit Harington and Emily Browning, acted badly and had the wrong type. The former also showed abs to fight, and the latter didn't even have the opportunity to show...
-
Gloria 2022-04-24 07:01:11
Hearing Anderson's name. The cost is not enough-- Speaking of ostentation, the director can spend 5 yuan for 100 yuan. That's what happened in Resident Evil 1. Unfortunately, later. . . . . ....
-
Tressie 2022-04-24 07:01:11
Love is the focus of the whole film, just look at the poster, but how many people go for the disaster behind, not this bloody...
-
Wendy 2022-03-31 09:01:03
A disaster with a decided ending, no suspense. Can't bring any sense of substitution. Only the scene is...
-
Marcus 2022-03-30 09:01:04
"Spartacus" plus "2012" can also be considered a kind of creativity. Too much speculation leads to thunder points, but for directors like Paul Anderson, its so-called visual department is estimated to be special effects. The story is quite complete compared to the "Resident Evil"...
-
Alexandrine 2022-03-30 09:01:04
It was completely aimed at the male protagonist. I didn't expect to see that it was a love movie at the end. With the help of a disaster movie, a love story between a warrior and a princess was staged. The shots and the passionate kiss of the warrior and the princess against the backdrop of the volcano are also...
-
Jensen 2022-03-30 09:01:04
The front was quite boring, and the action movie turned into a disaster movie in the end. The only thing that looked good was the disaster...
-
Johnnie 2022-03-30 09:01:04
This screenwriter is too bad, the plot twists are all bullshit. The most important thing is that such a movie that seems to be full of bloody battles is actually PG-13. It is better to watch an episode of American...
-
Kyleigh 2022-03-30 09:01:04
Obviously super nice! Yan Shuai praises...
Pompeii Comments
-
Trisha 2021-12-19 08:01:02
With each other's love, stay here forever
This is a film that I can’t forget so far. Although bloody and violent, it reflects the Roman ruling system at that time and reflects the true face of history. Many people understand that ancient times have no picture of blood. This film is really poking. There is no life and death in the arena,...
-
Anya 2022-04-20 09:01:45
A Shakespeare tragic love story
The film is actually a Shakespeare-esque tragic love story.
Let’s start with the senator, a person is actually an official, a wealthy person (hereinafter referred to as the second generation), who wants to go to Rome to pick up a daughter of the city owner of Pompeii, but the posture is wrong, and...
-
Milo: You trust them to keep their word?
Atticus: I trust the law.
-
Proculus: You're brave, I'll give you that, but no savage can ever be a match for a Roman.
