-
Albertha 2023-06-26 17:47:48
Between flowing composition and mediocrity....
-
Deanna 2023-06-20 20:58:57
The film is a biography of Marie Curie. Anyone who has taken a physics class must know her. It's just that in her past memory, she was thin, even symbolic. And this film introduces you to a more real, vivid, and even three-dimensional Marie Curie. For example, I only know that she discovered radium, but I never knew that such a serious, rigorous, rigid, and upright female scientist would have a relationship with a married man in her...
-
Jessika 2023-06-13 15:39:02
I think Marie Curie should be born with a hard temperament, not the strength after conquering the...
-
Kevin 2023-06-08 15:08:25
It's also disgusting to forcibly associate Marie Curie with the atomic bomb. There are thousands of uses for radioactivity, and as soon as the director slaps his head, yes, after radiotherapy, he shoots the atomic...
-
Kadin 2023-06-08 11:41:39
No center, too scattered. Interspersed in the middle are nuclear leakage, nuclear war, nuclear testing, and radiotherapy. Although they are related to the discovery of Marie Curie, I don't know what the director wants to express. There is no logic, there are a lot of materials collected but no ability to straighten them...
-
Waino 2023-06-03 10:01:43
The constant flashbacks completely broke the original narrative rhythm, and it is the kind of movie with too much ambition but the main purpose is deviated. Marie Curie deserves a better...
-
Herta 2023-05-31 00:48:03
The biographical film of the scientist Curie and his wife shot by an Iranian female director, the actress brilliantly reproduced the character and emotion of the great scientist Marie Curie. However, after the scientific invention was invented by the director, various disasters caused by radioactive substances over the past century were interspersed in the main narrative too much, and the positive and negative use of scientific invention was illustrated, which took up too much space and...
-
Eusebio 2023-05-26 18:27:02
Pike Chunhua as Madame Curie is the perfect choice. Her facial features are resolute, and even the upward curvature of the corners of her mouth is full of reason and wisdom. Her temperament is upright and restrained, like an iceberg that calms her...
-
Priscilla 2023-05-25 13:42:23
That's it? The largest space is devoted to the extramarital affair with Langevin, and also interspersed with the digression of the Hiroshima nuclear bomb and the American cancer treatment. The director really wanted to talk about women's rights, but it's too contrived (if not true) for women to take the lead in a standing ovation at the Nobel Prize ceremony. It's a pity that these actresses, I like every one of them. Marie Curie herself was an absolute tough...
-
Torey 2023-05-08 12:59:56
Too broken, too broken, too long to avoid this treatment. Even though the atmosphere is good, it is broken and thin. The script has finished the plot, but the look and feel is still... I can't give it a four-star...
Radioactive Comments
-
Lilla 2022-09-12 03:21:16
"Ah, I know what you want to express, but I can't get it!"
Good actor, good subject, good frame, met with mediocre script and editing.
In fact, it can be seen that the director wants to use an unrestrained stream of consciousness to intersperse and show what Marie Curie's life and her achievements have brought to the world. But unfortunately, the script is...
-
Cora 2022-09-11 18:03:58
Emperors will be forgotten and scientists will always be remembered
Watch this film two days after Marie Curie's death (July 4th)
weeping
-
Marie Curie: I see how you look at me, Pierre.
Pierre Curie: How do I look at you? Like a fermenting grape?
-
Pierre Curie: Your main problem, Marie, is your arrogance.
Marie Curie: My main problem is you. And the fact that I love you so utterly.
[stomps off]