-
Laurianne 2022-04-24 07:01:02
Storytelling sci-fi! ! ! awesome! !...
-
Franco 2022-04-23 07:01:11
When I saw the male protagonist appear as a string of text on the computer screen, I almost...
-
Amelia 2022-04-23 07:01:11
The reason why I don't like this movie very much is mainly because I don't like Jake...
-
Neva 2022-04-23 07:01:11
I gave it four stars because I think it can be shot better, the creativity is good, and the director's skills are not enough, otherwise it may not be another...
-
Ulices 2022-04-23 07:01:11
This movie has so many brains! With the development of the film's plot, the truth gradually emerges in front of the protagonist and the audience. Regardless of the rationality of the technology in the film, the logical thinking of the story is very rigorous, and the end is the climax of the whole...
-
Citlalli 2022-03-26 09:01:02
Although I fully understood this novel story as meaningful as "The Moon", it didn't come to light, and there was no surging heart. This is the shortcoming of Duncan Jones-at the climax of subverting the plot, the tension of the narrative is insufficient. But this kind of work will succeed, because a good story is always more important than a good...
-
Lynn 2022-03-26 09:01:02
It only takes 8 minutes to talk about a...
-
Imelda 2022-03-25 09:01:05
Science, science fiction, inception, soil and groundhog day are nothing, the key is to have...
-
Liliane 2022-03-25 09:01:05
Four and a half stars. A simple and straightforward 1 hour and a half, 1 set of theory, 1 love, 1 endless suspense, and N parallel universes that do not distinguish between the main and the deputy, and it does not matter who controls whom. The theory is not complete, but the logic is flawless. The idea is not shocking, but it continues the excellent portrayal of "Moon" in terms of characters and emotions. I thought that the kiss had brought a bad ending, but in fact it was not for love, but...
-
Noel 2022-03-25 09:01:05
Three and a half. In the middle, it was hoped that people could expect more, but the more you develop later, the more you feel that you are repeating some of the paths that the predecessors have walked. However, Duncan is good at creating a state of existence for a certain person in a repressive environment. This advantage is preserved, which is considered as touching, but unfortunately it is limited to...
Source Code Comments
-
Kamron 2022-04-20 09:01:09
"Source Code": Thoughts on Love
Sometimes, I really have to admire Americans. No matter how much money is spent, the stories are always so wonderful, the performances are always in place, and the details are always so durable. Source Code is that kind of film, costing only $32 million, but it's really good, and an hour and a half...
-
Braulio 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Brief comment
Well...
in fact, the story is very simple. The living brain is married into the code of another person's memory, and then judges through the brain supplement of subjective consciousness, relying on the details known in the memory and the new brain supplement added by the external "real" world....
-
Derek Frost: The world is Hell. We have a chance to start over in the rubble. But first, there has to be rubble.
-
Colleen Goodwin: Memory thread one. Listen to the following passage. "Lilly awoke in an evening dress and opera cloak. In her hand were five playing cards."
Colter Stevens: Is this a joke?
Colleen Goodwin: "They were, the queen of spades, four of clubs, nine of clubs, three of hearts, nine of hearts. "
Colter Stevens: Is this a Red Flag exercise?
Colleen Goodwin: End of thread one. Thread two. The following is a recording of a Western Screech Owl.
[audio of owl]
Colleen Goodwin: End of thread two. End of pattern. Acknowledge.
Colter Stevens: Acknowledge end of pattern.
Colleen Goodwin: Stand by to initiate pattern recall.
Colter Stevens: Go for pattern recall.
Colleen Goodwin: Arrange the five playing cards in order of descending value, irrespective of suit.
Colter Stevens: Queen, two nines, four and a three.
Colleen Goodwin: That is correct.The passage I read contained mention of a woman's name. What was that name?
Colter Stevens: Her name was Lilly.
Colleen Goodwin: That is correct. Recall my name.
Colter Stevens: Goodwin. Your name's Goodwin.
Colleen Goodwin: That is correct. Welcome back, Captain.
