[Actually, it is an archive of personal views. If you want to have a small discussion, please explain the whole sentence clearly, so as to avoid the unpleasantness caused by the unclear tone on the Internet. ]
I don't think there is any error in max.
Science is not the biggest problem. The biggest problem is that human morality and order will never catch up with the pace of science and technology.
What if that is not will, but a PINN that is intended to be will?
What if in the end Will really becomes Skynet who can link everyone against everyone who opposes him?
What if someone finally accesses the master authority of this superintelligence in some way to tamper with it for personal gain?
What if the final calculation result of this intelligence is that humans must be completely isolated from nature in order to protect both humans and nature?
With so much uncertainty and so many things that could go wrong, how can humans allow a superintelligence that no one can control to control the entire world when it is still possible to stop it?
Don't judge whether the choice made by the previous person is right because of Will's sacrifice at the end, he chose to commit suicide and did not hurt his old friend.
Besides, in the end, did he really make this choice because of human nature, or because it was the wish of his "master" evelyn?
How can you be sure that will finds out that if he needs to destroy, say, a country for evenly wishes, he won't choose to destroy a country?
The reason why people are still coexisting peacefully is because they can check and balance each other.
No one is the boss, and mice can eat elephants.
If there is a super boss, and there is no power to defy him, even if he is not necessarily evil, how can you choose to surrender?
It is impossible for mankind not to choose to strangle him in the cradle.
max is not wrong. He is rigorous.
View more about Transcendence reviews
