Old Julie, the cop who extorted confession, the sheriff who perjured, and Warden Buck, all fathers.
I just remember that at the beginning, old Julie said goodbye to his son at the port and said to him, live son.
Then I have another feeling. That is, many things are not resolved, but just pass by. The arrangement of the film is to bow to the drama, and many things are not even clear about right or wrong, let alone the trial.
Justice, society, family.
Depressed.
The public anger that forced clean officials to go to Liangshan in those days has once again led to new public anger. The judiciary cannot be blasphemed, and innocence cannot be blasphemed. Who is guilty and who is innocent, and who suffers and who is alone, I really can't tell.
What is the judiciary? What is the essence of the law? If the law and the judiciary are compromised with the majority, and the majority is rolling, the judiciary cannot have certain rules, but the law exists as a rule. . .
View more about In the Name of the Father reviews
