But when I got home and started to reminisce about this film, I felt as if I had fallen into a trap, or a kind of inability to break the logic of thinking-because the real Tommy himself is not a typical ordinary person, he is very strange, It's very eccentric, so no matter how James plays, as I said "played deliberately", we seem to be reaching the conclusion that "this may be playing the real Tommy". This kind of thinking mode gives James enough space to play and leave enough back. In addition, my understanding of Dave is limited to the minor supporting roles of Now You See Me, and I have to say that his acting skills are still too immature, with seamless smiles, sighs, head-turning, stunned, white-eyed, and angry. Open face and strong breathing to act, but never have a restrained face and meaningful eyes to communicate with the audience, this mere formal performance is afraid that his baby face and beard can't save him.
In the end, this film seems to have no position of its own, and the young actors in the film did not get a positive answer for "So what is this movie about". I even feel that this movie is a bit hot for leftovers, rubbing it against the heat of leftovers, and by the way to clear the suspicion of leftovers. Although the film is titled The Disaster Artist, it only talks about before and after the birth of The Room movie, and Tommy's human exploration is still less. Selfishly, I feel that if Tommy can enrich the trajectory of Tommy's life for more than ten years, or add some fixed long shots of Tommy's eyes and emotions in the whole film, the image of this character will be more plump.
In the end, I have to say that rich art students are really good. If you have money and talents, you can make first-class classics, and if you have money and talents, you can make first-class bad movies, and they still attract attention.
Poor, I really want to cry.
View more about The Disaster Artist reviews
