"Manslaughter 2" is too superficial, and "Force in the Eyes" is closer to the general public.
The eyes of the male protagonist of "Force in the Eyes" when he takes hostages are like a little sheep forced to come to power, full of helplessness and sadness.
The male protagonist of "Manslaughter 2" is a firm and forward-looking hero who vows to expose the shady scene. In fact, such a person finally chooses to sacrifice himself, which is very unreasonable. more dramatic.
Although the reaction of the people outside the hospital in the two films may be to arouse the audience's emotions, the unthinking coaxing of those "bystanders" really makes me a little disgusted.
When a relatively large proportion of the masses face the same problem, it is easy to cause social chaos. If the problem is not solved, it will indeed result in one after another like the male protagonist, coercing the government to achieve its own goals.
Basic livelihood issues need to be guaranteed. It is a great guarantee that ordinary people in our country cannot access something with a relatively large lethality like a gun.
When I watched it, I kept thinking, whether this kind of coercion can accept his request, and whether accepting it will lead to one study. From my rational point of view, exceptions are not allowed, and in reality, exceptions should not be allowed, but the movie gave a happy ending.
It seems that the ending in the movie is biased towards reality. Someone pretends to be the male protagonist surrendering, and then helps the male protagonist to change his heart behind his back.
Okay, no new gains.
View more about John Q reviews
