When it comes to Hollywood blockbusters, everyone basically likes them very much, but I always feel that Hollywood directors are not as good as Chinese directors and domestic directors. Not too bad. This is not the case with Hollywood directors. The first film finds a new theme that attracts your attention, and the second film begins to show the hateful faces of capitalists; very few can reach the third film.
Maze Runner is like this. In the first part, the subject matter is novel, and everyone thinks it is fresh. In the second part, the maze is changed to a battle royale, which everyone thinks is a transition, which is acceptable; when the third part becomes a complete failure of human beings, everyone is not satisfied.
The director is insulting people's intelligence. At the beginning, a group of people scrambled for the train, lying on the top of the train and leaking, and the army missed a bullet. Well, to continue after all. A wall the size of yours, a broken pickup will blow up. They all went into the basement to get the serum without giving the second male a drink, and waited abruptly until the second male died. Saying that your blood has antibodies, can't you give the second male a drink first? I haven't seen the male protagonist grow at all in the three films, just like the mentally handicapped male protagonist of second-rate Japanese animation, except for his blood.
Forget it, don’t write it, I wanted to write it better, but I feel like it’s a waste of time when I write, it’s a rubbish movie
View more about Maze Runner: The Death Cure reviews
