I think De Niro was killing. Al Pacino was the last to kill for De Niro. De Niro said "You Do you want to blame me?" In addition, De Niro is a sharpshooter and has never missed his hand, and the Russians have not been killed after three shots, indicating that he is not the same as the previous serial murders, and after the death of the priest, De Niro said He knew the priest since he was a child, and there is nothing afraid of Snow here...post something written by someone else, I agree with the point of view
In the film, there are a lot of loopholes to pave the way for the final ending, such as "The other dead were killed by people with perfect marksmanship. It is precisely because of this that the two young policemen doubted this marksmanship. Quasi outrageous Thomas, then, why did the Russian grandmother not die after six shots? The answer is only one possibility, that is, the murderer and serial murderer who killed the Russian grandmother were not alone, that is to say, the Russian grandmother was killed. The person of the serial murder is David. And the serial murderer is another person. So, why did David deliberately let the Russian grandmother who saw his face survive? It is conceivable. In order to cover up the real facts of the serial murder. No. Second, from the dialogue at the beginning of the film, we can see that David is not a horny person, but why did he go to rape his good friend’s woman after hurting his Russian grandmother? Because he wanted Thomas The woman took her photo to her Russian grandmother to only recognize her, so that the suspicion of murder would be brought to her. The only explanation for this was that he wanted to protect Thomas, because he knew that Thomas was a serial murderer. He wants to preserve his beliefs. He does not want his perfect belief Thomas to be a criminal under the law. Because he deeply knows that Thomas is a righteous man. So the film is called "just homicide." What the film wants to tell us is to kill. The price is paid, regardless of whether it represents justice or evil. For example, serial murderer Thomas. On the contrary, the righteous things will be protected, just as Thomas has not been punished by law, and David, he is a The soldier who defended justice, he protected Thomas, that is, he defended justice. His death was the most painful for Thomas, and it was also the punishment for Thomas' righteous murder. So there is a contradictory entanglement in the film, and it is this entanglement. Let the audience have an endless aftertaste. If everyone can read this film carefully, you will know why the two movie stars appeared on the same stage. Are they trying to leave a flaw at the end of their film career? You are wrong, I To say, they really deserve to be the daddy-level Hollywood actor.
View more about Righteous Kill reviews
