Recently, I watched some small-format movies with strong plots, "Cube 2", "Fermat's Room", and this "Ultimate Interview". They are not good. There are bright spots and grooves, and "Ultimate Interview" is a few of these. The department is relatively poor. This kind of movie story is like a balloon. It starts with a formation, gives the event, slowly lays out the balloon, blows up the balloon, and the more it blows bigger, the event slowly ferments and heats up. Finally, the balloon explodes, the mystery is revealed, the event is solved, and people feel psychologically shock on. "Ultimate Interview" seems to be leaking when the balloon is inflated, and the plot is deflated. Finally, the balloon is pinched and burst without much noise. Looking at it, it gives people a feeling: are you people so tossed?
The close-ups at the beginning introduce the characters are very bluffing, and they are well shot, revealing the characters of the characters, although the audience may not remember each character. Then enter the examination room, after some introduction, the examiner exits, leaving two questions, 1. What is the question, 2. Who is the winner. This is also the two points that this movie hangs the audience's appetite. As far as I'm concerned, when the story progresses to the point where the test takers find no obvious problems, and I think of the examiner saying that in the end, one of them will walk out of the test room with the contract, and the others will go home in the bus, I guess, this test There are no questions, the whole test is for test takers to fight each other for problems until one wins. White once thought so in the film. Audiences who have seen the movie know that there are problems, but the problems are so hidden that it is difficult for candidates to find them. The way to win is in my words. First, cooperate, kill each other, and leave one. In fact, the story can only develop in this way. Well, it doesn't mean that the audience can guess the plot is not a good story. This movie is even the opposite. The most unacceptable thing for me is a point that I didn't guess, that is the problem. what is the problem? Brain teasers, witty, and witty in a movie? Of course you can, but if the source of the story in a movie is such a brain teaser, then it can't help but make people feel like "Are you kidding me?" A really wise script, such as "The Witness for the Prosecution", the plot goes out Unexpectedly, the audience will admire the creativity of the screenwriter, and such as this film, it is simply playing the audience with self-righteousness.
This film is about an interview. Human nature is revealed in the interview. If the audience is unhappy with the movie making a fuss, then I think there is another "fussing" movie, "Mr. and Mrs. Smith", which uses fighting to compare marriage. It can be seen that the film's enlargement of the incident is not a dead end. In addition, there should be many people who think that the recruitment test is not a small question, and the way to achieve the goal by unscrupulous means is also a concrete manifestation of real life, which is understandable.
Whether in the movie or in reality, such a wonderful exam can’t help but make people feel tossed, especially in the movie, combing the clues in the dialogue, flashing back over and over again, constantly trying and failing, this kind of bridge is very slow and procrastination . Maybe I'm starting to think that the problem doesn't exist, and I'm going to think that this part of finding the problem is tedious. When the problem is revealed at the end, I believe most viewers and I should feel the same: the problem might as well not exist.
View more about Exam reviews
