I don't remember the outline of the story of "Wall Street 1" more than 20 years ago. I just know that the film won the Oscar for Douglas, the leader of the Hollywood acting family, and Oliver, who made "Field Platoon". Stone once again gained attention with a commercial war-themed film, which shows that American directors who have lived in the capitalist camp since childhood are not Bergman and Tarkovsky who do not eat human fireworks, do not talk about cultural standards, do not talk about religious redemption, steel bars They are still proficient in the laws of survival in the concrete jungle. At the same time, it also provided sufficient firepower and impetus to express their left-wing passion. Therefore, from the eyes of a non-professional, Wall Street is nothing but an arena of intrigue, short-selling and short-selling.
So, if you want to be ruthless, be ruthless to the end, and cut out the financial investment terminology that pops up from time to time, I would like to see how deep Stone can dig into the Wall Street pool. Helpless, the conspiracy theories that often appear in the film make me feel that sometimes people can become so stupid, and the young man who always talks about green energy changing the earth, and the small vase with a face full of cows immediately makes me feel the characters in it. Complete loss of confidence. Are the tycoons all preparing to recite "Hamlet" with their cigars in their mouths? The most incomprehensible thing is the ending. The young mother understands the true meaning of hard work to become rich, and she honestly goes back to be her nurse, although she has to murmur a few words; An anonymous investment of $100 million was invested in "the future development direction of mankind". In the end, the two single-parent families Rongrong just gave birthday gifts to the third generation of national capitalists. Earlier, Stone proposed "Who can save American capitalism?" "This grand proposition, in the end, has become an investment in environmental protection, and the husband and wife have both returned their homes. Isn't this product politically correct? The ubiquitous political correctness is like the colorful bubbles blown by the little kid in the film, floating into the air one by one, extremely strong and never burst. I wonder if Stone colluded with Michael Moore. One made a documentary version of "Capitalism: A Love Story", first reacted, and then one took over the feature film version of "Money Isn't Everything, But Without Love Is" Absolutely impossible", to re-educate. A dead fat man and a paranoid, although the two have no passion together, they can really stir up a tearful foundation. I have no choice but to lament the aging of the angry youths in the United States. I can't figure out whether they want to use the corruption and filth of the financial industry to insinuate what they are trying to do, or whether it is more simple and sometimes naive for everyone to turn somersaults in the eyes of money.
But having said that, no matter whether you are an idealist, a realist or a capitalist, you have to abide by the rules of the game when you play the game. Stone will naturally not expose the old foundation of a system and value system that has been running for hundreds of years, because he is also Survive under the rules of this game. Maybe it was because of the scorching world and countless swords and swords in this society, the reunion of vulgar literature and art in the end could be regarded as surrealism in another sense, rather than the Korean-style 2.0 version of shanzhai group gymnastics.
After spraying, let's talk about the Chinese boss inside, just one word: cowardly. Brother, can you be a little fresher? Your presence cannot save the US subprime mortgage crisis and the collapse of investment banks. In the United States, China has become more speculative in studying business science. It's a big mistake by Stone. It seems that the literary and artistic youth group has no pressure on the bills and US dollars.
View more about Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps reviews
