completely unexpected that this book has been adapted into a stage play. The arrangement of items in many scenes is deliberately placed, so There are often shots that contain a lot of information, and it’s not easy to understand them all. I’m lazy, and I don’t want to pause and study the information of these shots, so I’m confused. I don’t understand such a move. As for the rapid change of feelings, I don’t know if it’s because of the movie itself, or because I didn’t notice it… Anyway, I kept thinking, “Did the hero and heroine fall in love at first sight? They didn’t do it. Questions like what?
As a stage play, it must be relatively boring for many people. As described in many movies, most of the people who watched stage plays in the past were nobles and the like. Personally, I think it's quite boring, especially the first half, the latter part becomes tense and interesting with the development of the plot, but the music, scene switching, and character movements in the front are all bright and pleasantly surprised (the first time I watched it) The stage play...), it's a bit sleepy after the freshness.
Jude Law's Karenin is very tasteful. Although there are many scenes, it is a bit like a passerby...
Vronsky looks like Mario …
Students who are accustomed to the adaptations of story-based masterpieces such as "The Count of Monte Cristo", "Jane Eyre", etc. can try the new taste of stage play
. Overall score: 3.8/5.0 (score revised, original 3.7)
Entertainment Index : 2.1/5.0
I haven't read the original book. As far as the movie itself is concerned, I think Anna is self-inflicted. First of all, why did she want to marry Karenin? The movie said, don't expect a love marriage, so the two of them were not together because of love, but because of being married. Forced? But no matter what, Karenin said that he loved Anna deeply. Since she made a huge mistake of cheating and brought him a lot of reputational damage, he still chose to forgive her. Even if there were rumors outside, he still hoped Thinking that he had misunderstood her, what he did was wrong was that he took his work very seriously and traveled all day long, making Anna feel lonely. I think that if the other party didn't bully you or mess with you, he shouldn't betray him. Anna had the courage to do it, but didn't have the courage to admit it, she only knew how to say "it's very late", and then continued to go out for a private meeting, she wanted to go out and live by herself, Karenin asked her to live in a new house, she was even more unscrupulous, "I What did Karenin do to be reduced to this kind of field?" Karenin sat down in the chair dejectedly, just wanting an answer, she didn't say anything.
Finally, Karenin asked her to follow his lover, but to keep his son, and She was not allowed to meet, and she refused to do anything. It seemed that she wanted not only a divorce, but also a new love, a son, and even Karenin's blessing? People around her are not allowed to show contempt and attitude towards her! Extremely selfish in the
end, even the new lover who has no sense of love and morality can't stand her, although he still relents quickly and makes her believe in him, but Anna is desperate, just like this "love" based on desire, the so-called "no why" "Love", disintegrated and separated in front of doubts, Anna herself went to a dead end, if you want to blame it, she has to blame her for what she
thought the male lead of another love line did something commendable, but in the end, it was a big brother who was born with a bad background. His wife left his house, and he was still studying philosophy, which was no better than Vronsky. At
the end of the movie, Karenin sat in the sea of flowers and read a book. The two children were playing beside him. The originally lively stage was also covered with flowers. Swinging gently in the wind, this shot is very good
View more about Anna Karenina reviews
