Watched two in one night. The first part is just sex. I feel that for the heroine, this thing is like eating. It's a bit tasteless. The second part is the addiction. The heroine is controlled by it, giving up the child in pain, looking for feelings from the scars from SM, including the backlash of the body in the later stage.
And the heroine went from self-indulgence to self-loathing acceptance and even a little sacred at the end (but it feels like it shouldn't be possible) but she still found her own tree alone crooked but tough enough to stay alive She will stand up at the mutual aid club and say " I like my filthy dirty lust" and soberly criticize the so-called feminist defense made by old men "things all turn into cliches here"
Then when I found the tree, I was so moved and suddenly realized that I had to ask if this was a literary film? But generally I don't watch literary films... Maybe the sex scenes in it are still spice it up a lot... But the whole film is actually just the scene of the heroine and gerome at the end of the upper part, and it feels a bit sexuality (no matter it is joyful or not) IS the strongest instinct of human beings.
There is also the old man scholar vs actual combat experience. The discussion between the theoretical school and the practical school is also very interesting. In the end, the old man used the value of feminism to be so typical. With his last carbine, everything he said collapsed. This is also the vulnerability in theory
In the end, it took enough time to make two films and the characters were plump, especially p. In the end, I humiliated the heroine part. The logic of the characters was much smoother.
View more about Nymphomaniac: Vol. II reviews
