A great movie. Whether the few should be sacrificed for the majority, whether to focus on the small losses that are determined in the present or more likely to be large losses in the future, is always a controversial issue. How to build A set of protocols to push people to do their best to minimize harm and make the most balanced decision is the key.
However, I feel that this movie focuses more on depicting everyone in different positions, with different responsibilities and different purposes. How did they make their choices? As the poisonous sir said, those who make important decisions are the furthest away from the first battlefield, can you believe that they made the best choices? By the way, it feels a bit Slightly dark Britain....
This film is actually not complicated in plot, and there are not too many direct conflicts on the front line. It is completely constructed by switching between high-tech operations and command room scenes of different levels/characters. Thinking about it, it's almost a pure text (zui) drama (pao)! To be able to shoot so tightly, I admire the director and screenwriter so much. What
impressed me more is that the lieutenant insisted on doing another CDE, He choked the colonel hard. At this moment, his eyes were red, and it was because he felt that his actions were related to the life of a little girl, and he couldn't violate his own guidelines. This scene is very real
. The hula hoop, and the little girl's father's love and enlightenment to his daughter, and the contrast of the little girl dying in her father's arms at the end of the film, is like a needle pierced into the heart, it can't be pulled out, it is very uncomfortable. I
don't fully understand the lieutenant general What kind of image do you want to create, and the intention of buying a doll. Are you comparing two girls?
Finally, it's been a long time without girl's night! I miss it so much
View more about Eye in the Sky reviews
