I saw the destruction at the top of the society and didn't care about other people's lives and the natural environment. I also saw the stupidity of the people, thinking that it was good people who harmed themselves. In the beginning, they were against the people who broke their lives, and later, after the incident was revealed, they resented the people who helped them too slowly. And the environment is destroyed.
In this situation, the protagonist still firmly resists DuPont, and at the same time resists the capital and the masses. What is he insisting on? Maybe justice, maybe he knew it was the right thing to do.
Some of my favorite shots in the middle are playing countryroad while driving, the partner's speech, to hell of them, and DuPont boss fil's anger at the protagonist and saying sue me, i already sue you, fil scolding the country bumpkin, actually showing He came out more like a hillbilly himself, and the conversation between his wife and partner, I don't know what it was, but it wasn't a failure, and in the end, still here. Persevering to the end, he received compensation, is this a victory? Possibly, but DuPont is still running. Overall, it's pretty good, and it's a standard full-score movie for me.
View more about Dark Waters reviews
