How can I say it, I just came back from watching it, and I wanted to read the movie review before it was over. Agent Bean has never been judged by rigid movie standards, because it's just good-looking. But Johnny Ingrid 3, as a sequel to the first two, I would describe the first as awesome, the second as a climax, and the third as a really disappointing sequel. Speaking of which, it has been nearly a year and a half since the first Agent Bean movie. When I revisited 1 and 2 and just caught up with the trailer, my expectations were comparable to Marvel superhero movies. When I was full of boredom and wanted to vent, I bought a ticket, found a satisfactory seat, and spent over a hundred disappointing minutes. This time, it's still the same plot frame, or in other words, it's more framed... Maybe it's because of "aesthetic fatigue"? Johnny 2 follows the reversal plot of 1, and completes the evaluation of the film with Ingrid's personal charm. Johnny 3 is still the same, why is it not good-looking? Because this time, not only there is no reversal of the plot, but even Johnny is gone, and some are just improvised. The British humor of the first two films not only fleshes out the comedy, but also has an artistic flair that is simply the work of the artist. And this is like a third-rate writer's indiscriminate approach, which is unacceptable. I can only say that the director xx, the screenwriter xx, and a few old-fashioned votes will sympathize with you. Bad old man is very bad
View more about Johnny English Strikes Again reviews
