I don't need to repeat much of what everyone has discussed about personality, consciousness, shielding, and government. Just to provide another perspective. Could it be that the first man really did something that he didn't say? Did he smash the old man to death in anger and then never walk aside and watch the little girl fend for herself? Such speculation is based on two points.
One is foreshadowing. The second man deliberately avoided and concealed part of the truth when he told his story, but it was revealed in his story. For example, I didn't watch him go to the toilet, and as a result, many people watched, and then he told the first man. When he said he would avoid it, he was actually a businessman and accidentally witnessed the murder process. Do this as a foreshadow.
The second is the perspective. From the perspective of telling the story of the first man, he saw the little girl's every move, and even the picture of her dying under the tree was very vivid and detailed. Could it be an echo? The hint, like the second male, also concealed the unspeakable part. Of course, whether the interrogation and punishment of the consciousness of committing a crime is reasonable also needs to be discussed. Still, he sighed for the man.
View more about White Christmas reviews
