one is like berdan's "liberal" (I don't know what word to express) to explore the truth to the world and the other
is the dean's conservative let Those who are "injured" or lose their original beliefs take the initiative
to express as the movie wants to express, the "wall" of conservatives is invaded and destroyed, and it shows that the "liberal" is correct. On the
other hand, berdan represents Christians, and aisling represents "pagan".
What Aisling feared and caused him to lose his family's "Krum", but has the "Crumbaru Eye" that can explore the truth of
Christians The way to exclude other "infidels" (Aisling's family,
Berdan, hurt Aisling in many "indirect" ways)
I can also understand that Aisling rejected Berdan from coming to the forest at the beginning, and various religions should not interfere with each other.
I like this movie very much. The film, but I am full of dissatisfaction with this film,
probably because I understand history and tell the direct struggle of all religions so beautifully in the film, while reflecting the tyranny of the Vikings, while covering up the "rejection of "pagans". "
From another point of view, it is because Berdan contacted the "infidels" to understand, and thus completed the great Book of Kells. I
have to say that many things have their pros and cons, and we cannot judge the team is absolutely right. Right or wrong, and everything will become history with the Yanbian of the times.
The above is personal opinion
View more about The Secret of Kells reviews
