Teachers and students, father and son, husband and wife, classmates.
Homosexuality, extramarital affairs, teenagers with broken families, adults who can't have children.
These are countless fragments, with infinite possibilities through different combinations. Did it start with a controversial essay, or earlier? From ugly school uniforms? Or simply from the very beginning of human nature? It is to instigate students to continue to peep in order to satisfy their own desires, it is a blind affirmation of their own lack of talent; it is a designer who is imprisoned by her husband and son, and an artist who is not recognized. Obviously, everyone's life lacks a little excitement, so the child who can't separate his creation and life always has a way to take advantage of it.
Entering the room, in a house, you can hold the ethics of teachers and students, you can hold the same-sex ambiguity, and you can hold countless secrets. I can't tell which parts are real and which parts are just imaginary. "To be continued" is like a dose of poison, pulling in people outside the story and pushing people in the story down.
Every window, and the people in the windows, is really interesting, and the people watching the story are like a front-row audience, watching everything on stage carefully. What would life be like for those in the house? So, have you found your end yet?
View more about In the House reviews
