This article is purely personal opinion, neither professional nor objective.
This is a movie that seems to have a very strong dramatic conflict. As the audience constantly guesses the development of the plot, the real purpose of the male protagonist, the real purpose of the teacher, whether all of this happened in real or was fabricated together by the male protagonist and the teacher The plot, which is the director's genius, seems to be talking about how to create the work, and then allowing the plot to switch back and forth between reality and virtuality, but it can be seamlessly connected. But I don't think this can fool me. From my point of view, I think the film itself is talking about the creative process of a literary work, or this film is about the process of the birth of the screenplay, the constant revision of the characters, and the plot. The ups and downs of the setting and the seamless connection of the characters' plots, the teacher is the director, and the male protagonist is the screenwriter. The two of them jointly created the birth of this movie! Of course, I have to say that the method is really clever and deeply attracts the attention of the audience!
Of course, the scrutiny of the lines is also very important. I like the line in the movie very much: "Even if you are barefoot, the rain can't dance!" Very good lines.
I give this movie an 8, it's an immersive movie that captivates audiences!
View more about In the House reviews
