Who can make two women, one room, and one night into a 104-minute non-boring movie? It was difficult, but he really survived.
The film uses very important elements of European culture, from ancient Rome to ancient Greece, and my little knowledge of European history and culture comes from middle school textbooks, which are too superficial to be ignored. The protagonist of the film is Lesbian, in any case, I still need a process for heterosexuals to watch them naturally, so these can only be left out.
I have long had a point of view in my mind, I don’t know if it was implanted or spontaneous: From the perspective of love between men and women, women have rich emotional levels, delicate and diverse feelings, and more spiritual aspects. In contrast, men are more physical. Some, love alone is difficult to support all the happiness of a man. (Will it be a brick?) So the director uses two women to talk about their emotions, it seems that a purer love discussion can be achieved. That's why I guess he used Lesbian for this movie. It is obvious that after a night of communication, the two women have gone from purely physical attraction and physical attraction to the ultimate psychological attraction and spiritual connection, and they are inseparable. If it is a man and a woman, they may not be able to talk purely about feelings, and face the family and responsibilities, and eventually become "Landed Bridges".
The director's "Sex and Lucia" is a movie I like very much. I watched it at the beginning of 2003. After that, I also watched "Chaotic Ana", but it is not as good as that one. I still don't like it. I don't know why . Maybe I was more easily satisfied in 2003, maybe it was the film that caught my eye, maybe I didn't see the benefit of the director getting more and more in-depth.
View more about Room in Rome reviews
