Rotten Tomatoes gave it a very low rating. The score, even, only 1/3 of the famous bad movie "Wrath of the Gods", I really don't understand, the quality of "Warcraft" is already at the level of mainstream Hollywood blockbusters, and it has been given extremely bad reviews, yes , it still lacks in many places, but isn't your Hollywood mainstream story level only at this level? Why are only game adaptations treated this way, and other games of the same quality can have better evaluations? No, "Sword of Kings" is honored to be discriminated against by those film and television critics who think highly of themselves. There is no reason, it is purely because it is an adaptation of a game, and the game is always looked down upon by others. Cao Zhongjian was caught by the film critics and despised this CG movie, as if raising an objection would be labeled as "doesn't understand art". As a result, the hugely expensive "Sword of Kings" only received a small-scale 24-screen screening in North America, and it didn't even earn $2 million at the global box office for more than two months. These two-hour game advertisements are really expensive
. In the eyes of the tomato film critics, what is a movie that is "three times worse" than "Wrath of the Gods"? Really interested. Find a 1080P film source, filter out well-translated subtitles, and adjust your mental state, so even if it’s really difficult, can’t you see the special effects? Ah...how can I think like this, I was influenced by those idiots before I saw it
So, let's talk about the plot first. Many people said, wow, the plot is really mentally retarded, but the picture is very exciting. It seems quite pertinent, but why... I watched it for 2 hours, and I didn't find the mental retardation in the plot? Is the middle piece of the text longer and duller? Or the king's decision? The director does not recite this pot, nor does the screenwriter recite it. In general, the plot of "Sword of the King" is even better than that of "Warcraft", that is to say, it is still above the mainstream level. For example, "Prevention", then I can only say, please exercise your language skills before running to speak, that is called the excellent level instead of the mainstream level, right? If "The Lord of the Rings" is the mainstream, are you worried that there are no good movies to watch? Still need a movie review? Of course, there are still some clichés in it, but they don't have much weight. Compared with most movies, this kind of plot is not bad. In
terms of graphics, it is indeed very delicate. It is completely at the level of Hollywood blockbusters. The movements and expressions of the characters are smooth. At the same time, it shows some unnatural and a bit blunt appearance, but the impact is not very big. Anyway, the expressions of the orcs in "Warcraft" are vivid, and it is not the same. No extra points. The battle scenes in the film are quite grand, and various explosions delight your eyes, but they don’t do enough in terms of entertainment details. For example, the battle methods of the King’s Sword army where the protagonists are located are too simple, and the magic is used in a monotonous manner. But it has saved some from the design of the battle scene. Although the last paragraph is quite similar to "Children of Advent"...but...the performance of the old wall is really...as the prime minister said, very exciting, It's a bit unexpected
. I listened to the soundtrack before watching the movie. The number of OST tracks is amazing, but unfortunately none of them can be collected... It's better to watch it in combination with the movie. Only when it is combined with the picture can it show its charm and portray the battle. The shock is not suitable for individual appreciation
Overall rating: 4.1/5.0 (not losing to "The Son of Advent" at all, 2 hours of portrayal is still not enough)
Entertainment Index: 3.5/5.0 (The middle part of the literary drama is quite long and weakened a lot. Entertainment)
There is a small Easter egg when the end credits roll, but different from the main story, this little Easter egg seems to have a Japanese mouth shape, but it doesn't matter, it's just chatting like this
The mage girl couldn't figure out why she wanted to hang up. First of all, she was sent undercover. It was a royal order, not the captain's order. The purpose was to give Princess Chicken Soup's hair bun with a tracker, so that she could monitor her movements. The captain sent someone to kill the mage girl, but the bun was not sent to the princess, which should mean that the captain did not want her to be tracked, but the problem came, in this case, the captain's plan was not to let the princess get the bun , Why did you use a bun to position the princess to get the ring? Is he sure that the male protagonist will definitely give her a bun?
The battle of the big octopus was rather sloppy, and it was solved in a hurry.
Maybe some people think that the plot is bad because of the inexplicable actions of the king. Let’s not say whether he is right or not, isn’t life full of inexplicable decisions? Just a minute ago, I gave a gift to the female ticket, everyone was happy, and suddenly there was a quarrel the next second, it was so inexplicable, okay? The male protagonist did that because of his sister, the captain did that because of "the king's betrayal", and the good friend did that because of confusion, the chicken soup female protagonist... Who knows what happened to her. And the king, perhaps he firmly believes that his son's power can reinvigorate the country, although he really wants to protect the people of the capital, but also knows that he has not enough power, objectively speaking, abandoning his own people like this is playing the game of breaking the boat , it's still quite ridiculous, you can even say that he is crazy, but he is the king, this is his own decision, you can hate him, not the screenwriter, because the behavior of the characters in the play is not easy for the heroine and the king. I understand it, other characters are so normal, why do you say that the plot is bad?
View more about Kingsglaive: Final Fantasy XV reviews
