The heroine is the director's wife. When I found out, it really made me stunned. Well, I feel that the director has a big heart.
The play tells the story of a playwright who adapted the Austrian author Marsock's "Venus in Furs", and then selects the heroine. The original is a well-known sadomasochistic literature, and the movie keeps swapping between "reality" and book characters, as well as s and m. The acting is great, the inheritance is great, and the sense of substitution in layers is also great.
I was deeply impressed by the director's crazy words in it, and most annoying those stereotypes that are used to it, wantonly elevate anything to the stupidity of social problems such as abuse and discrimination against feminist racial classes. Simplifying one thing into another is the easy way to go, but there is no denying that it is very mindless and irresponsible.
Hey, thinking about the identity of the heroine Wanda is very mysterious. First, she coincidentally has the same name as the heroine in the original novel. She seems to be abject and superficial, but she has superb acting skills and is well versed in poetry and books. The hiring thing had to say that she was a detective hired by her fiancee, and then she auditioned for a role as high as she became obsessed with the role of the screenwriter. up, stripped naked and wrapped in fur, dancing eerily around him. The end of the play.
During the first half of the film, Wanda asked the editor if Venus was hiding in a different mortal body to tease the male protagonist. In fact, she herself is one of those mortals.
View more about Venus in Fur reviews
