Although the name is a dog's way home, it is obvious that the director wants to say too many things, what is home, what is belonging, what is family, what is friendship, and the whole film seems nondescript. If bella is seen as a dog, then all I can say is that this movie is nothing more than a fake carnival for dog owners.
The story of the film begins with the male protagonist adopting a stray dog. According to the description of the film, this is illegal in the local area. However, the male protagonist's family disapproves of this and obviously lacks legal awareness . The villain of the film is a law enforcement person who catches dogs. For the normal law enforcement behavior, the male protagonist and his family try their best to obstruct it. Originally, the male protagonist also knew that it was illegal to bring a dog to work, but in order to avoid being arrested, the male protagonist had no choice but to do it. Unexpectedly , the company leaders not only failed to stop this illegal behavior, but the dog became an indispensable happiness. fruit. This kind of plot can only be imagined by some crazy dog owners. Because of a dog, the male protagonist willfully violates the law and can get the support of almost everyone except the villain. I am afraid it is a fantasy.
Finally, even when Bella and the male protagonist's family made mistakes, Bella was finally captured, and then under the pressure of the authorities, the male protagonist sent Bella to relatives in other states. At the relative's house, Bella was well taken care of, but Bella still jumped off the wall and made her way home. Bella's behavior is unwise and unrighteous. The unwise is that if there is no protagonist's halo, Bella can't know the way back home, let alone go home smoothly. The injustice is that Bella runs away from home to either the male protagonist or the male protagonist's relatives All bring trouble, the male protagonist's relatives are not easy to explain to the male protagonist, and the male protagonist has completely lost Bella.
Then there is the main film Bella's way home. Along the way, I meet good people to help, including but not limited to being rescued by two adventurers when being besieged in the forest, being taken home by a skier during an avalanche, being taken in when encountering a homeless person, It can be said that homeless people are released after death and so on. It can be said that this is all the wishful thinking of dog owners. Think about what Bella has done along the way, accepting human charity without saying anything, and learning to rob a human supermarket after following a group of dogs. Just after the meat was roasted, Bella jumped out from the side and took it away, and the child was crying. It is unimaginable that such a wicked dog can get the help of so many kind people.
In the end, Bella went home. At this time, the audience will ask, which state law prohibits keeping dogs, so at the end of the film, a group of veterans of the American Empire appears politically correct, forcibly justifying the adoption of Bella on the grounds of federal land. The boss of the villain obviously forgot his responsibilities and instead said politically correct that you are the heroes of the US imperialists, so you can raise dogs casually in violation of laws and regulations.
What do I want to say about such a dog rights movie, it's just a fake carnival of dog owners.
So why are there two stars... I can only say that CG is doing okay.
View more about A Dog's Way Home reviews
