Why do kids eat their mothers? Assuming she couldn't help it, why didn't the mother notice the abnormality and lock her baby up? Can't figure it out. And there is a problem with the settings inside, can (demonization) become powerful? Killing and eating people can make you stronger? The buffs obtained by killing people include developing muscles, becoming handsome, gaining superpowers, and becoming super attractive. This value is indeed distorted and wrong. Although killing can reduce competitors, it has a good ecological cycle just like the natural environment. In order to round this contradiction, the author even said at the end that the devil existed before the ecological circle. . . .
Another problem with the author's values is the definition of the devil. Murder, cannibalism, is sex the devil? The fondest memory is of a little boy who ate his dog first and then his mother. I feel that what the author intends to express is that since humans even eat animals, they will also eat people if they are liberated (in the case of demonization). This world view is not wrong, but it is also not right. Even if there is a phenomenon of cannibalism in history, it is all under the conditions of famine and desperation. All the survival laws of human beings are originally to live and continue the race. If you insist on defining these behaviors (eating animal meat, breeding, war) as demonization, then if you extend it further, all behaviors that belong to the survival and continuation of the race are belongs to demonization. For example, there is a view that plants are also alive, and the water also contains a large number of bacteria, which should not be killed; at the same time, for the survival or existence of others, one should commit suicide and dedicate one's body to bacteria and fungi. Angelize.
Briefly. Author's point of view: living or continuing race = demons; death and extinction = angels. Such three views are distorted, so it is normal to be banned.
View more about Devilman: Crybaby reviews
