Two human rights lawyers helped a soldier defend the case. The reason for winning the case was that the video, audio and video were out of sync, and the soldier was able to "reveal", but then the soldier was involved in another case. The case is complicated and confusing, and the male protagonist is actually the culprit, because the lawyers and others want to expose the method of "transferring flowers and connecting trees", which is the method of the National Security Bureau's Anti-Terrorism Bureau (official!) "framed" some terrorists Muslims and other "heretic" methods by grafting videos. The forces of the four parties are constantly fighting, one is the male protagonist, the one who does not know it, the other is the female protagonist, the police who want to find out the truth, the one is the senior leader of the National Security Bureau's Anti-Terrorism Bureau who knows most of the situation, and the other is to safeguard judicial justice and use The technique of moving flowers and connecting trees is intended to expose the "underground organization" of "moving flowers and connecting trees" (there is a feeling of attacking the shield of the child with the spear of the child). At first I didn't know who was who, but then it became clearer as the plot deepened.
The plot reflects something, write and think. First, what is the truth? Seeing is believing and it may be the "truth" that others want you to see. That's why the heroine said, before you asked me why I wanted to be a police detective? Because someone who says "leave it alone, there's nothing suspicious here" is an absolute lie. In this era of information flying all over the sky, what everyone sees is only part, not the whole. In fact, it is difficult to achieve this. Many of what you see are really only what others want you to see, and deliberately guide the direction of public opinion. It's not that there is none, "the ignorant public doesn't need to know too much", so many things should also have an attitude of "guarding against others", think about the source of the information, who the publisher is, and what purpose will it have? , If it goes on like this, what are the consequences, what is the meaning... We may not be able to touch the truth, but can we think of the opposite of the positive and negative sides of things? Only in this way can we have a relatively comprehensive judgment on it.
Second, black technology, AI face-changing technology, video clip grafting, hacking, the development of technology is only for human use, technology is not wrong, but it depends on how people use it. Sometimes means and methods are not important, but the starting point and purpose of doing things are important. Is it for the interests of the general public? national interest? Personal interest?
Third, there are many cameras. On the one hand, it protects the safety of the public, criminals are easy to find, and criminal incidents are easy to find. On the other hand, it makes the public lose their privacy and expose themselves to the authorities. I hope the official is a good official and serves the people.
View more about The Capture reviews
