Just like the name, the movie is full of doubts. It can be divided into three lines. One is the male protagonist’s behavior and personality, the other is the female protagonist’s doubts and discoveries, and the other is the perspective of the person next to it.
According to the first point of view, the male lead likes detective novels and is good at discovering all kinds of killing methods, and the interaction with the neighbors in the play makes him completely motivated to kill. The author is designing the protagonist as a playboy who is greedy for money and selfless, idle and idle, which greatly improves the feasibility of the whole story.
The second heroine route is like watching the plot of "Rashomon". Everyone has their own statement. The heroine's suspicious route in the film is not undesirable, but it will fall into a scene. In the plot of the "authoritarian fan", all her motives for suspecting the male protagonist are also given all the clues that can be established, but that can't be established. The reverie is not that the fact did not happen. This is in line with the purpose of this film. , I can't figure it out, the scope is wide, it's not a solid object, and it's difficult to distinguish the direction after entering it.
The third bystander route. From the perspective of the entire film, all the things that happened in the film were explained in just 100 minutes, but it seems that the screenwriter did not give a real answer from a third party. , Any incident (borrowing incident, friend death incident, cliff edge incident) is the answer verbally expressed by the male protagonist himself, then the point is here, I did not judge this as a screenwriter’s error, because the purpose of the whole film is suspicious. In the end, there is still a bigger suspense, which is what is the ending of the heroine and the heroine?
Throughout the whole film, the screenwriter has given many foreshadowings for the audience to judge, such as the motives of the male protagonist approaching the female protagonist, the male protagonist develops his own career through the relationship between the female protagonist in all aspects, sells the chair, and inherits what follows the incident Some small movements, the dining table event with friends, have given a reference value for all events. The director's use of blank space to lock his eyes on all doubts is one of the biggest highlights of the film.
Even at the end of the film, it didn't explain whether the ending really exists, which left the heroine confused and the audience confused.
View more about Suspicion reviews
