After watching the first episode, there is actually anti-hunting? After Hitler's defeat, the Nazi war criminals kept their names incognito and lived like mice. They went around looking for Jews to continue the racist slaughter? He really saw a ghost! The Jews are right. Americans don’t care if one or two Jews are killed. I have also heard of hunting down the Nazis in history. I always thought it was a detective film under civilians. I didn't expect it to be a gangster film under the supervision of the US FBI. It seems unfair to the Jews. The characteristic of the Jews is: can not forget, what a good advantage. What should you do when you survive the massacre and find that the person who killed you actually became your neighbor? To forget the past and move forward together, or to count the old and new hatred together, and fight him to death. Some things, some words, are also of educational significance to us, such as those who committed evil in the Cultural Revolution, they have not repented so far, and if there is a disturbance, they will immediately come back to life, and they are still developing young people. If sin is not accounted for, it will always be sin!
Persist in watching this play through. The overall background setting is more attractive, and there are several reasonable points.
At that time, I thought that the Nazis must have lived their lives secretly. The point should be that these people took their cocoons to find people, and found out the process of investigating and tracking the Nazis from civilian life. The most fascinating plot was not. This is the first point of losing interest.
Then, the flip of the last episode is too random. It was the Nazi leader who led everyone to follow the Nazis. Isn't that the one who was full? The gang of cadres who pursued the Nazis were all Nazis, including the yellow-haired woman and the Asian man. Since everyone is for a common cause, why bother to hunt down and kill each other? The colonel girl did not die, and Hitler did not die. This is not a serious drama, but a soap opera. We are watching serious historical dramas in our room.
In the hunting group, a few capable people are bad guys, and a few good guys are soft guys. Can such a group succeed repeatedly? However, the details covered by the government are a bit interesting, and some people support it. In the end, the black police also broke away from the system and did it alone outside the system. What do you want the police to do? The two sides were fighting each other, killing so many people, and all kinds of explosions. American reporters and policemen pretended not to see it, and the people just watched it that way. It was a little too divorced from reality.
One of the unprofessional aspects of the squad is that there is no verification link, and no proofreading and interrogation link, so I just killed it when I was happy. In addition, there is no link to cover up the effect of the investigation after the fact. Whether you are dead or not, it depends on the screenwriter's word. If you don't see it in the next episode, you will die. One day there is no plot, you will come back to life again, without any preparation.
On the contrary, the villain was murderous, and in the end he wanted to agitate the white man and killed a lawyer in prison. All in all, there is a good and attractive setting, and there is no serious reasoning and analysis process in the middle. It depends on a creative idea, occasionally adding some technical details, and then finds the enemy, starts doing it, and finally the group of people who do the enemy are still bad guys. It seems that the second season is to prepare Jonah and the black police to take the lead, and prepare to go to Europe to hunt down. I hope the second season can be better. And then come back to do that kid in prison in the third season?
View more about Hunters reviews
