News Processing Industry

Keagan 2022-01-07 15:54:50

One of the basic national conditions of our country is that there must be a loyalty and a traitor in any matter that involves human contradictions. Other than that, it is not the basic way of thinking of the people in our country. Up to now, the first decade of the 21st century has passed. The vast majority of people look at history and see things like ancient theaters. From the beginning, they must distinguish which is loyal and which is traitor, and it must be very clear. It must be very, otherwise it is not a good play, a good script, a good story, the character of this thing is unclear, etc. If an actor plays a role very wickedly or loyally, a good actor. If the acting is both good and bad, it means that the actors are not good enough. Almost all people who have this kind of simple thinking can see that a person's life is like that.
If this is just our thinking for watching TV and listening to stories, that's okay. But the fact is that this thinking is often used in real life. When most people read the news, the first thing they do is to wait for the news to tell him which is the bad guy. Or the vague news guides you to judge which is bad or good. Generally speaking, officials are bad people, people are good people, those who have money are bad people, and those who don’t have money are good people~~~~
This kind of simplicity Thinking that is almost ignorant is still very common. It's just that it is more secretive now, but it still occupies the Chinese way of thinking. But today I want to criticize not just this way of thinking of the public. This way of thinking is certainly ridiculous. It is caused by many reasons, left over from history, the rulers of thousands of years have been ignoring the people, and there is information asymmetry. So what is hateful is not for the masses. What is hateful for the news media now To cater to this way of thinking, the news should also be written like a Chinese script. The headline at the beginning should be a traitor (such as a corrupt official) to attract people, or a good person (a hero who saves people, etc.) can be used, and then The rest of the content is to take out all the ugly and dark sides of the traitor for readers to enjoy. When writing a good person, it is the same. The truth, goodness and beauty are all taken out, and he has done a good thing, and that person's other things are good. What kind of academic performance is good, usually helpful, etc. etc.
I never think that the job of most media in the world is to report news. Their job is to process news, some are news that leaders love to watch, and some are news that audiences love to watch. News that is processed as much as possible to attract the attention of one party is good news. When processing and changing tastes, you will also attach your own values, and casually defend your position and interests. This is the media. The media is the uncrowned king.
Many people now know that the essence of history is that the values ​​and political positions of some people are hidden under historical events. What history looks like depends on the position of the people who wrote the history. News is almost like that. News is not complete. It’s a real fact, cctv news is cctv news, and bbc news is bbc news. It is processed like history. What news is processed depends on the processor’s values, political stance, interest stance, and It is the popular taste of the public. You have to clarify the fact that the real product of the media is not news, but advertising. For example, when you are watching TV, for a TV station, the audience's first job is to watch commercials, inserting TV dramas or news in between to relieve your boredom. So don’t think that it’s an advertisement in the program, but it is actually an advertisement in the program.
So audience readers look forward to loyal and wicked news, and the media will process the loyal and wicked news, label them, and show them to others.
The Internet is just such a world. As long as you go online, someone will greet you immediately: Guest officer, what news do you need?

View more about Shattered Glass reviews

Extended Reading
  • Sam 2022-04-21 09:02:57

    Now it is estimated that it will become a powerful self-media public account that occupies your parents' circle of friends...

  • Maribel 2022-03-25 09:01:15

    Journalism negative textbook...

Shattered Glass quotes

  • Chuck Lane: [during a litigation meeting] We've read through all the pieces now, the entire staff, and we've come up with a list of those whose facts and sources we couldn't verify independently. I know you can't admit guilt of any kind but I want you to confirm a few titles for me.

    Glass' Lawyer: We're not prepared to confirm or deny anything at this time.

    Chuck Lane: What I'm going to do is this, I'm going to read to you a list of suspicious titles, one by one. If you raise an objection to a particular title, we'll fact check it again in the hope of removing it from the list. If you remain silent we'll assume that piece is fabricated either partially or entirely, and it'll stay on. Is that clear to everyone?

    Chuck Lane: Okay.

    [Chuck reads from the list]

    Chuck Lane: "Hazardous To Your Mental Health."

    [Stephen remains silent]

    Chuck Lane: That means it stays on the list of suspicious pieces, fabricated pieces.

    Glass' Lawyer: We understand, can we move along?

    Chuck Lane: [Chuck continues to reads from the list] "Holy Trinity," "Probable Clause," "Don't You D.A.R.E.," "Spring Breakdown," "State of Nature," "Rock The Morons," "After The Fall"...

  • David Bach: [over the phone] Look, I'm really sorry to bother you at night but it seemed important.

    Chuck Lane: It's fine, is there a problem?

    David Bach: Well, I don't know. I just got off the phone with Stephen. He sounds horrible. Did you suspend him, Chuck?

    Chuck Lane: David, what is the problem?

    David Bach: He asked me if I would drive him out to Dulles later tonight, he said he wasn't sure he'd be safe driving by himself. I thought I should draw your attention to that.

    Chuck Lane: Did he say where he was going?

    David Bach: Yeah, he said he'd be staying with his family for a while. That could only be one of two places.

    Chuck Lane: His parents live in Highland Park, right?

    David Bach: Yeah, or his brother out in Palo Alto.

    Chuck Lane: [Surprised] I'm sorry?

    David Bach: His brother at Stanford.