After watching this movie, in general, I feel good, and the drama is still quite strong. After reading a lot of comments, I feel that some people feel that there are more bugs. Let’s talk about my thoughts and interpretation of brain supplements:
0. I think it is really deliberate and artificially set up a few paragraphs that are not bugs but seem very false:
The death of the youngest son. It's hard for me to understand why a family walk will let the youngest son walk at the back, especially when there are monsters around, no matter how the adult is, he should be the queen. This is common sense, the setting here is very anti-human and unreal. Die to die.
The second is that nail, which is really a common prop that appears in one million horror films. It will pop out and get stuck in human feet, and nobody cares about it.
1. Why is it so easy to kill monsters?
I didn’t pay much attention to it, but I feel that the movie only tells about a remote village under a big world view. A newspaper flashed past the army or the whole country was defeated by monsters, but those were news from a year ago. After that, the family was basically isolated from the outside world. There was no new source of information, and his father could not contact others. It can be seen that in the area where they live, there are relatively few people, and there are more old, weak, sick and disabled people (widowed old men and the like). It seems that the technology is not too advanced. It should be a refugee or a small number of people living in the local area.
The monster’s setting should be amazing in attack power, very agile, difficult to aim and shoot, bulletproof, and other people will be killed when they make a sound. Belongs to the attributes of high agility, high mobility fighters.
People in this area are indeed more difficult to quickly destroy monsters. Being ruled by these three monsters within a year is not a bug.
As for the whole country, we don't know the situation. The movie only says that there are three monsters in this area, and the state of the country is unknown.
In the worst case, perhaps the whole country has been dominated by monsters, or it is possible that humans are fighting with it, which we don't know. The movie only intercepted a very small point, and the general environment did not explain it. But logically speaking, these should not be regarded as bugs, it can only be said that the movie did not explain it.
2. Why do you have to have a baby?
Personally, it is mainly because the parents feel guilty about the dead child and want to regenerate, and some kind of strange reproductive impulse? I feel that what the movie wants to show is mostly the former.
Personally, if I have to let the heroine give birth to a child, I can write that the heroine was pregnant just before the monster came, and the movie can be filmed nine months after the monster came, and the heroine gave birth. This seems less deliberate.
3. Why not move to the edge of the waterfall?
This problem is rather strange. Moving is too troublesome. For example, a complete set of surveillance guards, electricity, and crops may not be easy to carry. Obviously the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Moreover, the sound of water also attracts monsters. Although it will cover up the voice of the protagonist, the probability of monsters coming is obviously much higher. But I think I can go on vacation by the waterfall during my childbirth.
4 What is the meaning of describing the old man?
On the one hand, it highlights the horror of monsters and inspires the growth of children, on the other hand, it echoes the father's yelling and sacrificing himself. Some people say that this is inexplicable, but I don’t think it’s a normal form of screenwriting. It’s hard to understand the horror atmosphere of a passerby NPC.
5. Why do people think a lot of bugs?
In fact, all the previous questions boil down to my personal feeling that the screenwriting of this movie is based on the inversion of cause and effect, the concept first, and the logic of the characters then supplement it by itself.
All the scary methods and the methods to inspire drama conflicts in this movie are forced and artificial. Such artificial settings, such as creating a nail in order to stimulate conflict, make the heroine give birth on the same day, and leak water, making everything appear deliberate and false. If the audience cannot be convinced in a short period of time, there will be many doubts about the character's logic and plot structure that the movie does not fully explain.
Once this kind of questioning arises, the audience's degree of trust and investment has actually been reduced.
For example, I have seen a writer who said that an elevator crashed and the couple inside saw the truth in adversity. This is touching.
But if the couple can walk out, but still live and die inside, such forced lyricism seems very nonsensical.
Of course, in other words, it may be that this kind of concept is in front, and all aspects of the horror monster film are quite good (such as the soundtrack, structure, drama tension, actor performance, audio-visual effects, etc.). Perhaps we need to hypnotize ourselves first. Ignoring all kinds of bugs, I really believe that the protagonist refuses to move, the monsters just can’t be eliminated, the heroine will have a child, and the nail must be pierced when the nail pops out. In this case, we will find that , This movie is pretty good.
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Recently, it was released in China. Many viewers commented on this article, adding a selection and answer link:
GnBenjamin : The first one is obviously a misunderstanding . The situation of reading newspapers and the male protagonist listening to the radio is obviously not the disaster of this small mountain village but the destruction of the world.
-Yes, this must be a worldwide disaster, but it is obvious that this family has been isolated in this village and cannot obtain information from the outside world, so we don’t seem to know what happened to the outside world this year, maybe many Someone everywhere has discovered the weakness of the monster and won it.
Qin Shimingyue : Do you have the resources? Share with me if you have any, thank you!
- No.
greha n: Regarding the nail, I think it will make a sound if you pull it...
Wang Junjie : Are you going to knock a nail?
-Some people have doubts about the nails. So let's take a look at why this kind of wooden staircase is nailed in the middle of the staircase from bottom to top during the production process. Under normal circumstances, it is nothing more than reinforcement on both sides? The location of this nail is unreasonable in the first place. Secondly, you don't have to pull or knock, you can still remind it. But at that time, my mother was about to give birth and she should have no time to take care of it. This makes sense.
zenzen zen: When the hostess gave birth, why didn’t the cry of the baby attract a monster?
－I didn’t pay attention either. It seemed that the child didn’t cry when he was just born, and then he was sent to the basement?
I love big lazy people: Why should we focus on the logical discussion? Shouldn’t we pay more attention to the form of performance and the novelty of the subject matter? The sense of substitution that will make people involuntarily cover their ears and steal the bells will make people feel that this is really quite good, very shocking, and audiences who pay too much attention to logical reasoning should not watch horror movies at all!
－Some people think that watching horror movies cannot pay attention to logic.
In fact, if the plot is made more fluent and the logic is a little more natural, the audience will not be easy to play, and should be more engaged. So, horror movies need more natural logic, right? For example, the first two films of Wen Ziren's Latent, which I like, have many interesting time-space cycles, such as the horror cruise ship, and they also have detailed settings on reincarnation and cycle. For example, ghost films such as Sadako and The Grudge are actually special to ghosts. The function setting is also designed with ulterior motives. Even if it was Kunchiyan a while ago, although it did not reveal the secrets of the mental hospital, many of the details were actually told the story of the audience such as the mental patient and the female director.
As mentioned earlier, I think the format and subject matter of this film are very good-looking, but there are a few places where it is obvious that the screenwriter simply and rudely chose the kind of plot that is the easiest to create a drama in order to create an effect. People have some drama.
? If you have played The Last of Us, you won't ask these questions
-never play it.
Liar: The one who said why the youngest son will be at the end must have never seen The House Alone... I feel that foreign parents have so many children, not necessarily so nervous children... And monsters are not always 24 days a day or two. Stared at the child for hours
－Since Xiaoguang has watched Home Alone in cctv6 ten times, I think these two movies are incomparable. The parents of House Alone had a bunch of children. At that time, they drove the car, and they were so in a hurry that they forgot that the youngest son was still at home. This is the same as in this movie. The parents knew that there were monsters and their lives were in danger (this is not driving a car, they walked leisurely). He also left the youngest son behind, and didn't notice that he stole the toy along the way. This kind of strange plot is completely incomparable. I think, even if it is written, the parents have been protecting the son, but when the other son had an asthma attack and had no time to take care of the younger son, he rang the toy. It was a little more reasonable than the current plot, right?
Foreign parents are not nervous about their sons. This is a subjective assumption and will not be discussed.
It was impossible to hold the child 24 hours a day, and later they also let the daughter go out by herself. But the youngest child was only three or four years old, and the whole family was cautiously going out to search for supplies. The place was still careless and not paying attention to the younger son. It was still the screenwriter’s carelessness, and the rude design caused the younger son to die.
View more about A Quiet Place reviews
