"Let the Bullets Fly" and "If You Are the One 2" were released at the same time, and it was in the exam period. My classmates just wanted to pick one and ask me which one is better. "There is no comparability," I said.
However, those who have something good start to say which is good and which is bad.
After the "New Shaolin Temple" was unveiled, there was no doubt that critics again aimed at it and "Bullet", and the box office battle began on the day of its premiere.
I can somewhat understand that some people say that "New Shaolin Temple" is not good. It is true that a movie cannot be enjoyed by all audiences, but I do not understand that they say that "The Bullet" is inferior. In my opinion, these three movies are not comparable. In my humble opinion, in general terms, "Bullet" falls into the category of drama, "No 2" falls into the category of romance, and "New" is undoubtedly an action category.
I think it's ridiculous to have to put three different types of movies together to make a one, two, three. Can you experience Liang Xiaoxiao's pain of wanting to love but not being able to love in "Bullet" and "New"? Can you see wonderful martial arts in "Bullet"? Let me put it in layman's terms. If I ask you, "Titanic" or "Shawshank's Redemption Is Good", do you think I am insane? Even if you compare it
with "This Killer Is Not So Cold", which is also a romance movie, you can't tell you how ugly you are. Unlike the current remakes of "Water Margin" and "Three Kingdoms", even if it is the same type of movie, you like the plot of one, why don't you allow others to appear? If you concentrate on waiting for "Let the Bullets Fly", you have come to the wrong place and watched the wrong movie. I like letting bullets fly. I like it very
much. I watched it twice, once with my friends, and once with my mother. After watching it, I have been addicted to the plot. When I went to bed at night, the bullets were still flying. Regarding the plot, I definitely recommend it.
However, the rave reviews of "Bullet" also has many critics. There are also people around me who have been recommended by me but shake their heads frequently, saying: Haven't you seen other Hollywood blockbusters? That’s right, the scene is not grand enough, but a small goose city is really magnificent except that the story is like a stormy sea. I think the opening part of the train is pretty awesome.
As for the reasons of other critics, I am puzzled, so I have to guess wildly: the humorous way does not agree? The scene is a little bloody? The gap between the film itself and the heart? All sorts of things produced are not objective evaluations, which are rumored to be false, which is very good. A good film has missed a group of audiences. But I think that when someone asks for your opinion, you still need to evaluate it objectively.
The success or failure of a movie lies not only in its own gold content, but also in the viewer's remarks. Please think about it carefully. Is there any movie you want to watch, but your friend told you it was boring, so you gave up. By chance, you saw this movie, but you think it is actually very good. About baseless assertion, "3 Idiots", "please shut up" are no doubt affected
victims, some Eupolyphaga movie name, movie scoring very low, if not a coincidence, I really do not see that at least two Movies that can be ninety cents.
Rumors stop at the wise.
Speaking of "New Shaolin Temple", I have to talk about the old version of "Shaolin Temple". It deserves to be called a classic. It broke 300 million box office with 0.15 in the year. So I can't help worrying about the new version. What I worry about is not its gold content, but the old version. The peak of "Shaolin Temple" and the craze of "Bullet", coupled with the weekly box office lowest point on Wednesday, will anyone start making extravagant comments. Sure enough, someone talked about the two. If the person who made this comment said that the new is not as good as the old before reading it, I want to tell you aloud that you have no right to speak; if the person who made this comment was born to watch the movie with the heart of supporting the classics and opposing who transcends, I I want to tell you loudly, you also have no right to speak! 28 years ago, my age was still negative. I watched "Shaolin Temple" only after I watched "New". In order to avoid preconceived ideas, I watched it again with all my heart. According to the order of my viewing, I regard "New" as the old and "Old" as the new. I still feel that each has its own advantages, and each has its own enlightenment. Jet Li was really tender at that time, his acting was not very proficient, and his playing was really wonderful. The abbot in "New" was just one of his disciples back then. He was so heroic, and he liked his "kind" feeling 28 years later. because
Many people say that the martial arts in "New" are not as good as the previous ones, so I paid special attention to it. However, it is a pity that I really don't think the new is as good as the old. As far as the plot is concerned, there is no similarity, the era is different, the hatred of the characters dissipated, and the experience of converting to Buddhism is too different. "New Shaolin Temple" can be changed to another name, so that it can reduce the number
of people wearing colored glasses to watch the movie, and they don't have to be hoped to surpass the glory of the predecessors. "The Bullet" was placed 28 years ago, maybe it was a dispute with "Shaolin Temple", the result is really unknown. This is not the embarrassment of the same era.
Returning to the movie itself, Jet Li is a king-level figure in action movies. You can say that Andy Lau and Nicholas Tse are laymen. Then Wu Jing and Shi Yanneng, as well as the little novices in Shaolin, which one is not real or not. Blind your eyes? What's more, it is said that Jackie Chan is neither literary nor military, and he makes a lot of comments on his strange accent. I wonder why you are intent and what do you want to hear. On the "Premiere" column, Andy Lau said: Watch me in the play and Jackie Chan in acting. I don't think this is a historical change, but it is definitely a bright spot. Jackie Chan's play in the play is not without it. He used the methods of cooking and kneading to make his own way. I think that section is really exciting and intriguing. Nicholas Tse and Andy Lau’s rival dramas are very interesting, but you have to say that both people earn attendance based on the same face. I’m sweating. You don’t praise others for their acting skills and don’t allow their parents to be handsome. Don’t you? Is it just jealous and handsome and good acting? The most frustrating thing for me is that some people say that the reason why the new version is not good is that the plot is too procrastinated, as can be seen in the three-minute trailer. So according to this comrade, the success of "Bullet" lies in the trailer. When you watch this trailer, you look forward to it, because you don't know what kind of story this movie will give you. But for "Bullet", if the story tells you, what else do you watch? At the end of the film, it is marked to be adapted from "Ten Chapters of Night Tales" (I declare that I haven't read the original version. I don't know how different it is.
It is classified as 80% similarity), if you really read that story, would you still look forward to it? Are you entangled while watching you know what is going to happen next, for a drama audience, I will understand you very well. After watching all the movies, you can put it in a nutshell. "Bullet" is where a bandit and a county magistrate defeated a bully, and "Fei 2" is a tangled emotional experience of two people. "Red Cliff" is a household name, "Three Kingdoms" was filmed and filmed, so why did you watch it? Maybe you really didn't watch it, because you are not the one who enjoys the visual feast. Then what are you doing watching a movie? The wonderful martial arts in the film, the profound dialogue, and the actor's intentional interpretation are all for nothing? What are you doing alive, anyway, sooner or later you will die. Leaf barrier
head, you like frogs. Don't forget what the movie brings us.
After talking about the film as a whole, let's talk about every part of it again. First of all, it is Andy Lau. If an actor’s best performance is 100 points, I will give him 99 points. 98 points are objective points. One point is added because I am a Chinese fan, and one point is missing because I hope that his best movie will be the next one. Department. He carefully performed the transformation of the character of Hou Jie, indifferent, suspicious, and changed his past mistakes. The scene of the loss of my beloved daughter brought us all the audience into grief. Even if I am not a fan of Hua, I will still be moved by him when I watched this movie, not only because of the plot in the film, but also because of Huazi’s hard work. Although he is called the immortal king of heaven, he has not forgotten years. At 50 years old, why don't we applaud his diligence? Those who want to criticize, said that the substitute in the film is obvious, because my ears are not like him, I am really happy. Are you sure you are not looking for the fault? I have no intention of defending Huazi, because you didn't go to watch this movie at all. But I have to defend him. Wah Tsai suffered a lot of injuries during the filming. The crew was obvious to all. Everyone said that he was basically useless as a substitute. It is funny to say that his queen double slapped the bullet to fly, why are you fighting with other people's ears. Jackie Chan, as a kid who grew up watching his movies, looks forward to his performance and is also satisfied with his performance. In the film, he spoke Henan dialect and was ridiculed outside the film. I just wanted to scream for him. I didn't use dubbing. Isn't it good? ! As a film with a somewhat depressing plot, this part also makes the audience's mood a lot easier. Nicholas Tse, I think it's difficult for Cao Man to perform. He is arrogant, young and frivolous, cruel and cruel. Nicholas Tse has even "passed" and entered the show. Fan Bingbing, although I don’t particularly like Fan Bingbing, her acting skills in it are very good, I give high marks, and it’s really beautiful. As a warlord’s wife, her temperament is very good; as a child’s mother, her affection is very good. . It is said that in the scene of being pushed into the fish tank, the hot water was temporarily changed for fear of being put on help. It was really hard. Wu Jing, Shi Yanneng, and Yu Shaoqun also moved people in the film. The spirit and friendship deeply infected me.
Good deeds, I hope I don’t make the case that I am a Chinese fan. Because "New Shaolin Temple" doesn't need me to defend it. If everyone says it is good, it is really good, and it is fair and comfortable.
A movie is not only the object of your vent, but also the hard work of directors, actors, and lighting photographers. If it is not a commercial film that deceives your pocket money, please enjoy it and give it some positive incentives for the development of my country's film industry. If you have the ability, you should also make a decent movie.
View more about Shaolin reviews
