Then this one is still a little green in the ten thousand green bushes, not outstanding, not pleasant, just a look at it, it can kill some time, now it has committed the fatal injury of the sequel, overthrew the first stalk, and arranged another one by itself. The truth, and this truth is still full of loopholes, vulgar, and the courage of the screenwriter does not know where it comes from.
It’s okay to advance before the ending. Although it’s not scary enough, at least the narrative rhythm is good, and the atmosphere is also in place. Brahms’ design does have a cool back feeling. The state of motionlessness is the same as Annabel, with a lot of salt and added. The vinegar space is boring if you let it move. Those set rules are completely set for the first part. It is embarrassing enough to reuse it, and you can slap yourself immediately, regardless of whether your parents follow the rules or not, finally The end of the game is also death, so what is the meaning of Brahms' existence, is it to kill each family's parents inexplicably? There are more than one or two similar logical problems. The moment the mystery is revealed is like a waterfall falling down. All the hard-working things in the front collapse in an instant. The basement duel, the administrator's identity, the two in one he, I kind of want to curse, really. It's too outrageous. The audience who watched the first part believe that they can't accept such tampering. Will you be sincere if you want to reincarnate?
The boy's acting skills are really bad, he has been hovering between being unable to play, is he chosen because he is like Brahms? It's no wonder that they are bound to have three lives.
View more about Brahms: The Boy II reviews
