It's noon on May 19th. At the bottom, I added a bit of my personal understanding of the plot. I also said that I only used 45 Hong Kong dollars to buy tickets at the time, which is less than 40 yuan. Maybe this is also my five-star. One reason.
Also, given that someone replied “smelly and long” below, let me remind you first: This article is about 8,700 words, which may waste at least 10 minutes of your precious time.
On the 16th at 9:15 in Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, the sound of the theater was very good. The sound of shooting in the film shook my ears. Then you all know that this film is shooting from beginning to end. I try not to be spoiled except for the plot related to the drama, but in fact, the whole film has no plot. As long as you watch all the trailers and reveal highlights of the forced station above, you can spell out the general plot by yourself, although there are some discrepancies in the trailer with the main film.
In the Hong Kong version I read, the subtitles translated "Mainland Hotel" as "Qing (or "Poor") Tiantu". At first, I thought that the translation of this name was too good for the second martial arts. After reading it, I felt that the translation was quite appropriate. I don’t have much culture about the term Qiongtiantu. The explanation should be “the pagoda that covers the sky”. If anyone has a different explanation, please point it out in the reply.
If you like martial arts movies, don't miss this whole series.
The whole story actually tells us: don't owe others favors, sometimes you may have to pay for it.
Pure personal opinion, pure personal opinion, pure personal opinion. Sheer nonsense. If you disagree, then you disagree, I have no opinion. If you want, you can leave your different opinions in the reply and discuss it together, or just click "useless".
Also, let me tell you in advance that there are some laughs in the film, and there are also some highlights in the play. If you have not watched the movie, and you will not feel so happy when watching the movie after watching the following things, now, Just, turn it off, the web page! ! ! immediately! ! ! immediately! ! !
——————————————
.
.
.
.
It is the morning of May 17th. I might have to say why I still give five stars. First, I gave the first one three-star, and the second one I thought was better than the first one, so I gave four stars. This one really does. I think it's better than the second one. At the same time, although at the bottom I think the plot is very brainless, but these are problems that I discovered after a whole day of recollection. When I watched it in the cinema, I felt very good. The five-star award was also comprehensive at the time. Look and feel. The bloody, fancy and funny worldviews have been developed, but they are not excessive.
.
.
.
.
Because the film was rated as a tertiary film by Hong Kong, the previous trailer was "Annabelle 3: Homecoming", which did not scare me as far as this trailer is concerned.
.
.
———————————————
This film feels that the number of people is not as large as the previous two (referring to the person john wick solved by himself), but it is better than the quality. If a general action movie is a series of plots to play, then this film is a play that in turn promotes the plot.
The first game is the book VS the giant swordsman in the trailer. The time actually happened before the expulsion order excommunicado (don’t you think this word sounds sexy?) officially took effect. The front is the footage that broke out. John wick was chased and killed by the dog and the taxi was blocking the section of the road. In the back, he ran to the library to pick up the tokens in the book. After taking it, we will start playing. This time is really to tell you what is called "knowledge is power". I remember that Jason Bourne also used books (or folders) to beat people, but this film is better than him. It’s fun. There are more tricks. But I wonder if the plot of the whole film tells you "If you break the rules, you will be fucked over." Is it okay for this Russian (I hear the accent it seems to be) to not behave at the beginning? But it doesn't matter because he died.
Then came the second Chinatown Throwing Knife Fight. Why did it say that this film was a play-off and in turn promoted the plot, because John went to Chinatown to find an old Hong Kong Chinese doctor to sew his wounds after being deeply stabled by the giant man above, and half of the sewing time was up. The excommunicado formally took effect, and then the old Chinese doctor asked John to shoot him to prove that he was not helping John after six (a bit funny here, the Hong Kong audience next to me laughed quite happily). As a result, as soon as John went downstairs, he was chased by Chinese assassins and chased him to the weapon store. First he blasted a man’s head with a revolver and was forced into a narrow corridor full of cold weapons, mainly knives. John is here one-on-seven (or eight, I also planned to record how many people John killed in this film and then officially gave up in Casablanca), the scene scheduling and all kinds of integration are the best in the whole film . Before the premiere commented that there were five minutes in this period? When I watched it, I felt that it was only a few dozen seconds at most, which was really too dizzying. Personally, I feel that the rhythm is more tense than "Assault 2" Ikouais hit two hammer sister baseball brother and "Slaying Wolf 2" Zhang Jin hit two Tony Jia Wujing, really is the dagger flying randomly. Chen Hu fought with Keanu the longest and was finally pierced to death by a dagger.
The third game was not as interesting as the first two games. A group of Italians (or Spaniards) drove twice into John, then John ran into the stable, used the Malay scene to kill the enemy, and then ran across the street on horseback. Kill the two motorcycles, skip it.
In the fourth game , I left New York and came to Casablanca, Morocco. There was no big problem until the boss here shot and shot Halle Berry’s dog, and then the two men slaughtered. This is the longest fight in the whole film. Fragments, I began to understand why some commentators would say that there are too many dramas to be a little boring. In addition to the crazy shooting of the movie, the headshot and the headshot make my dog's ears explode, I think there is another reason that I don’t have a feeling for dogs, so I don’t think the third scene above and the scene of animal cooperation here are not very good. It appeals to me. Actually, there are some scenes in the film that have nothing to do with John. I'm not saying that these places are badly filmed, but they are not that interesting.
In the fifth scene, John returned to Grand Central Station in New York and chatted with the main villain Japanese killer. He stabbed an entourage and killed two motorcycles. First of all, I haven't watched "The Wicked Girl". What's so amazing here is that I thought it was a fast-editing scene like in the trailer, but it turned out to be a long shot with a bow from left to right at the beginning? ? ? The whole play is very short, but very powerful.
Then the Japanese assassin chased them all the way to Qiongtiantu (this translation is really interesting), because although John had to die, the rules of no use of force in the hotel were still there, and the two entered the hotel. Then when the two were waiting for the boss Winston, the Japanese killer said that he was a big fan of John (it’s also funny here), and the "Judge" (Hong Kong translation, why didn’t this role have been mentioned before, because she didn’t Rough. Very reasonable. The judge is just the person responsible for spreading the message and issuing the order. Anyone who is a little bit observant will not embarrass the judge.) Announcing the hotel is "returning to vulgarity." To die. By the way, the process of "returning to vulgarity" from the issuance of the instruction to the official entry into force, which I personally think is the most compelling (good compelling) segment of the film, means that anyone can open fire at will in the hotel area. Then there is the sixth scene: In the trailer, the "High Table Meeting" (Hong Kong translation), two buses with more than ten or twenty special troops appeared, here needs to be emphasized: I personally think that this play is all three parts of the scene. The most fierce fragments that best reflect the style of this series. The black chief explained in particular: In the past few years, the equipment has been updated by leaps and bounds, and their helmets and armor are no longer afraid of ordinary bullets. The latter is indeed the case, you can imagine the kind of elite monsters that ordinary bullets can't cause damage to them, but can only cause hard hits and knocks down, and can only attack weak spots to kill. So in this clip, you can see John's pistol with 17 crazy headshots in two seconds, but the opponent has no loss, and the scene of turning around and getting up again after thinking that the knife is completed. John also shoots at the neck and shoots at super close range. The glass part of the helmet can kill people, which is a very good expression of the operation.
After changing to a shotgun in the back, it was a child with one shot. Someone was smashed into half of his head by the shotgun. It’s worth mentioning that, in addition to the famous line "Guns, lots of guns!" in the trailer in the trailer, there is also a green background of the hotel shootout. The image of the soldier firing three shots underwater. I personally think it is a tribute to "Bullet Time". If it is true, it should be the most creative way of tribute I have personally seen. I can think of this plot in reality. People who imitate bullet time are really geniuses.
I know now that some people may ask: "Didn’t the two villains of the raid series appear in the trailer, the mad dog and the claw man? What about them?" First of all, they have appeared about three times before, and there are also two fights but nothing is very difficult. It is worth mentioning, and the setting of the plot is to arrange them as apprentices under the hands of Japanese killers. I don't think it will work, but after all, it is just a story under a different world view, and there is no need to be too demanding.
After fighting the elite soldiers, they went to the glass house to start the last three consecutive games. The first floor was two Japanese men with excellent leg skills. John was beaten (literally), but they were killed by John after using the knife.
And I want to interrupt the talk about one, it is in this part that John becomes, I think fighting is not very disciplined. I started hitting someone's testicles three or four times and biting people later. It is estimated to reflect that he is getting old in this movie and he is gradually weakening, and all kinds of new injuries and old injuries.
Then came the seventh game : Zunwijk (Hong Kong translation) VS Assault Claw Knife Duo. In theory, this is the highlight? But what should I say?
First of all, the mad dog and the claw man are not dead. Yes, in fact, none of the three people saw any blood injuries. John hadn't been beaten badly by the two Japanese downstairs. In short, the plot is like this: when John went upstairs and was knocked down by two people, the two respectfully reached out to him to fight again, John was knocked down again, the two waited for him to get up again, and then John raised his hand to propose a timeout in the midfield. Agreeing, John pulled out his belt and started the second half. Facts have proved that an inch is indeed strong.
I think there is a problem first: the action styles of the "john wick" series and the "raid" series are not the same. The three people here are actually a bit funny? Because first of all the two claw knives of the mad dog claw knife, I have never encountered John in my memory. At the same time, because this series of ground battles are mostly, but the raid has never engaged in such things (the two in my memory do not have active ground battles) , That is, the fighting is indeed very real. It is estimated that the fighting scene in reality is almost like this, but it is also very ugly. The height gap is also a problem. I didn't notice it when I watched the raid, but they are indeed a bit shorter than Keanu Reeves. But whether this comic is good or bad, everyone may have different judgments.
But the game was good, and in the trailer, the three of them fell to the lower floor of the glass house together and the two of them could not end. Are these the only two enemies in John's three who have not made up their swords? It can be said to give full face.
Oh, by the way, I once seemed to see the reflection of the camera in the glass house. By the way, I would like to ask if there are any movies that have great breakthroughs or techniques in dealing with mirrors? If you know or have a recommendation, please leave the name of the movie below.
Finally, John killed the Japanese killer.
Then it was gone. John fell from a dozen or so floors (visually) because Winston gave him a few shots, and he didn’t seem to suffer any serious injuries. From here on, John has been a bit of a trend toward the "Furious Heart" series (I remember Jason Statham was Which one fell from the helicopter and didn’t die), Qiongtiantu became a "sacred place" again (Hong Kong translation), and the ending hinted that there might be a fourth one.
Are you asking my overall evaluation? First of all, the play is better than the first two. I actually don’t think the first two have any unique highlights. At best, it determines the series' own story action style. The second one is good for fighting various killers. Pencil killing is especially good. . As for the story, I think it is the same as the previous two. No, do you really think that the first one is so boring to kill the Russian gangster or the second one to get revenge and kill that person? I don’t know how much higher this one is than the previous two. If you have to say that there is a problem, it is that some of the play scenes are too thoughtful, and the rest of the usual play scenes become unnecessary.
————————————————————
And those who say that the plot is not good and give low scores, are you fucking stupid? Do you look for the plot in this whole B-rated film series? For two hours most of the time in various fights, you will be bored. Are you not satisfied? Do you know what action porn means? I wonder why you guys are so awesome, why don't you analyze the film like "Rome"? Did you fucking spend money to watch it? Run a pure cool film to find a sense of existence?
Worldview? set up? Who the hell cares about this? Why should you care about this? And you all know that this is not a real world, but a virtual world of parallel settings. Are you still looking for realism in it? Then why don't you just ask the people in the first two movies to sniper directly or kill John Wick with a bomb, isn't it all right? Why not ask why "Kill Bill" can take a knife on the plane, why can it crawl out of the buried coffin with an inch of fist, and why can it hit 88? Why can't the entire three heroes of the "Hurricane Rescue" series die? Why can't there be a few bazookas in "The Eunuch" to send him to the west? Why are the two brothers in "The Executioner" so ostentatious and pretending to make all kinds of mistakes and they won't die? There is no need to say anything about "Furious Attacking Heart". I wonder if you all watched these films so happily that you started all kinds of provocations here? Really your mother is like a mentally retarded.
Move your brain and think about it. The filmmaker wants to put it in the two-hour film to show you what it conveys, and what are you discussing here? What else do you look at when shooting all in accordance with the logic of reality? In reality, there will be a killer hotel in New York? The most important point: remember that there were policemen in the first two movies? Why don't you think about it first, why this movie doesn't make you think about the world. Are there any policemen? Do you especially want to see the police? What other countries' armies are also joining the battle? ? ?
No, can we calm down and think about it again, are the first two plots really good? Personally, I didn't think it at all. OK, at the beginning of the first part, John was pressed on the ground and watched his beloved dog killed. It was really contagious, but nothing else. And, if you want to take a comprehensive evaluation of the plot of the third part so seriously, shouldn't you think about inconsistency after reading the three parts in a row?
Why can't the cold front be killed, I'm John wick...I can't? Damn me? It's not a lesson, it's a lesson too much. I just like this, I can't bear it, don't look at it! Look at the beauty, this is the film made by the Americans. Then isn't it all over now? It's all over now.
Anyway, I personally think it's worth the fare. The color palette and soundtrack are great, and there is no shortcoming in the whole (if I have to say, the Moroccan scene layout is a bit too studio, the whole film is a little bit hard to connect the plot), as for the plot itself, different people have different opinions, who It's impossible to convince anyone. If you are interested and have the opportunity, you can go to Hong Kong or Taiwan to check it out. Anyway, most people just post a gun version on the Internet in a few months and then pretend to comment, hehe.
————————————————————
It's the early morning of the 17th, and I thought about it for a while and felt it was necessary to talk about the plot.
First of all, this plot is different from the previous two, because it becomes a two-line parallelism, with John wick on one side and the judge on the other. But the judge’s problem is that her line is the kind that you can always guess what she will do next. She is responsible for questioning and punishing from beginning to end, and this line is very boring. Belongs to this line. She must advance steadily to finally conquer with John at the Continental Hotel.
And come back to John's line? It's almost the same. There is a question: If the plot does not go like this, how can it go? Could he not reach Casablanca? impossible. Could Sophia not help him? impossible. Could he not see the elders higher than the "High Table Club" dying in the desert? It is absolutely impossible. Would he not cut off his ring finger? To be honest, he really had no other choice at the time, everything was too logical. Could he kill Winston in the end? It is possible, but here is another problem.
This reminds me of the "Ultimate Fighter" series. As the villain in the second part, Boyka is like the first John who is only a high-level killer. In the third part, Boyka begins to face enemies of different styles at the same time. Facing the warden of the new prison is like in the second part, John is in more trouble while paying favors and fighting with different people. In the end, Boyka gains money and freedom, and John limps for his life. (Oh, it's also a lame run at the end of Boyka, exactly the same), the worldview continues to unfold. In the fourth part, which is my least favorite one, Boika still had to accept the kind of nauseating inner salvation, because his conscience was disturbed to help the widow of the person killed by himself solve the gang and also used a gun. Inwardly shaken, in the third part, John swayed in front of the elders and in front of Winston.
I want to give the story a layer of ideology. For example, this film talks about "cause and effect" and "rules", but the first two films can't support it at all, just like Boyka in the second and third films. It's not like the kind of person who starts to question himself after killing an anonymous person. Maybe you can say that it was because he returned to the normal world and became a normal person, then I can also say that John became less determined because of his gradual disability. When Boyka started to care about the dead man, he was doomed to happen later. Finally he returned to the familiar prison. Just like John decided to break with the high table, he was doomed to challenge a bigger first. Ministry of the Russian gangster. These two roles can't hold up any deep ideological connotations at all, after all, the essence is still a B-level film.
But quick preparation is definitely better than Ultimate Fighter 4, and the freshness of the play is ten or even nine times stronger.
If you think about it, you will find that John did several things in this film: escape, kill, find someone, continue to escape, continue to find someone, go to the desert to find someone after killing someone, and find someone to kill when he comes back. In the first part, he was driven by revenge, with clear motives. In the second part, he was driven by favor, and finally he had to have revenge. In the third part, he was no longer angry, so he had to passively protect himself. He kept defending himself until he announced his break with the high table in front of the judge. At the end, he was indeed angry again, and he had enemies again. It can be said that he was completely "Furious Against the Heart". At least what the movie said this time was right, "back to square one". Can you think of any plot for the fourth part? What does this have to do with the third part? The first two parts are destined to be like this for the third part. I also don't know where your love for the first two plots comes from.
In other words, there is almost no suspense between the judge and John. John is definitely not going to die—is it really the end you hope to see if he fell to death outside the hotel—the suspense is not here, it is that John will definitely win, but the key is how to win. How to beat a giant with a book, how to kill two people with a pencil, how to fly a knife to kill seven or eight people, how to kill everyone next to you while riding a motorcycle at high speed, the most important thing is how to do it in a few minutes Win the two big villains of the raid within time. The suspense is here.
And this whole film is equivalent to not solving any problems left over from the second movie: John is still being hunted down, the hotel is restored to its original state, and the beggars just turned underground.
The role of judge is actually a failure-not that the actors failed-she is actually the incarnation of the high table club, but the first two films were not completely laid out. She took up a large part of the film and died. A lot of people didn't do anything, it's true that they were a naive person, and the reputation of the high table club was stinky.
Wow, if you think about it this way, this movie is a bit rubbish. The more you think about the plot, the more mentally retarded. For example, Harry Berry directly hides behind her (although she does nothing but it is quite abrupt to me), the bad reviews by those people are completely justified.
I actually have many explanations for the fact that there are so many people chasing John from beginning to end: For example, many people are still waiting and watching, or they would rather choose not to die than 14 million (adding 15 million later), after all, this kind of diamond is no longer a diamond. The porcelain work that can only be acquired by the Diamond Dragon Diamond is to highlight a wealth and danger. Everyone knows the name of your baba yaga. Or, in fact, there are a lot of people coming to kill it, but they don’t have to be shot. I thought about 72 hours from the beginning of the film to the end.
So now, when I said at the beginning, "This film uses drama to advance the plot", that might be the case. I suspect that they may have designed the action scenes first and then tried to string them together. All the characters and scene settings are designed to cause conflicts in the right places-such as running into the weapon arsenal by such a coincidence, and running into it by such a coincidence. stable. For example, the boss has to shoot at the dog. What kind of brain damage can do this kind of thing? ——So you can arrange a play. Anyway, the audience will look at the action and it will be over.
So what I mean is, don't have any expectations for the next series of plots, it's impossible. This sequel is estimated to be filmed indefinitely. Poor John wick can never spend his old age in peace, just like Boika can only be beaten in prison forever, this may be their home, a person can only have one destiny in his life.
But back to the top: Why demand the plot of an action movie? If the action design behind can be more innovative, violent and stunning, I can watch it indefinitely. Most of you spend money to watch "Transformers" in the cinema just for special effects. Each movie has its own selling points.
Oh, by the way, in the end, John's pointing his middle finger was also a joke, and it was also very "Furious".
Alas, it’s actually wasting so many words and pictures of my sleeping time code. I know that it’s not the real world, which means I can’t use real logic to apply it. Don't think too much, take the initiative to immerse yourself in it, the movie is just an illusion, OK? Go to the theater and get up!
————————————
If you see those above, you think it's very logically confusing, normal, just nonsense. I think I’ve been brain-ridden by the intense gunshots of the movie, or maybe it’s because it’s half past one in the morning.
————————————
But you have to ask me if I am expecting john wick4? To be honest, I won't at all. This kind of plot where one person singles out one organization is very easy to fail to return to the end. Sometimes in order to avoid the sequel ruining the good impression of the first few movies, I choose not to watch it, just like I did not watch "Fast and Passion 8". ". And you have to pay attention to one point. The real fighting space in the whole film is actually very small, and it is diversified, so it can be played. If you go back to the first two linear scenes, the gun battle is the main gun and the gun headshot. If you say so, I think it’s a step backwards. But how is it possible that in the fourth part, different kinds of killers from different countries are in turn like the third part? It is estimated that they are all special forces, who knows? It's all just guessing.
Let me come back and add one more point: I did not say that the action scenes of this film are "very good", OK? It doesn't mean this at all. This "good" is firstly a comparison with the previous two movies and various movies of the same type, and secondly, it is in line with my own taste. All of my logical foundations above are based on the first two movies I watched. The subtitles and sound effects of the movies I watched in Hong Kong will be different. You can also think that the action scenes are very bad and there is no problem.
————————
I have thought about some controversial plots in the past two days. The following is my personal understanding:
First of all, why the judge immediately announced the start of peace talks. I don’t know if you have read "The Godfather" (the first book). If you have read it, I might explain it better: it’s not that the high table will not be able to send more people, and It's not that they can't keep killing until they kill John and destroy the New York Continental Hotel. But it is not in their overall interests to do so. The special forces and killer teams who only sent two vehicles failed to solve the problem overnight. It showed two situations: either the initial judgment was wrong and then the temporary recognition was necessary, or it was the beginning. I just thought that either they could kill them or they could negotiate with them after killing them. And don’t forget that although there is no police at all, this work should still exist. There is no need to expose the entire underground industry by killing one person. As long as excommunicado is still in John, he will always be hunted down. The priority of this matter is completely inferior to the core interests. , Maintaining stability is the most important thing. And finally recruiting An Winston again is the relatively best way to solve the problem at the moment. There are no eternal friends and enemies, only interests are eternal.
Next is the most controversial plot. Is Winston a good person or a bad person in the end?
Still the above sentence: Are you fucking stupid? In your eyes, Winston has two situations: Either he turned into a bad guy and wanted to kill John but he was lucky enough to not die, or he was a good guy and had to shoot John to fall? Can we not be so dualistic depending on the problem?
Go back and read your favorite second one again. In it, Winston and John are acquaintances of stakeholders who keep a distance. There are not many good friends. Winston delayed the release of excommunicado by one hour and led to this judge. When he came to the door, Winston had served the high table for a full 40 years, and an industry benchmark was still ordered to take over and retire within seven days. In the middle of the cooperation with John, it is plain that both people have the same enemies and need to help each other. In the end, the condition of the judge's peace talks was "first do john wick and be sincere." No matter if he is a good or bad person at this time, do you think he had any other choice besides shooting John immediately? This is the same as John cutting off his ring finger and offering the ring to the elder, he has no choice. What you see is the fact that there is no preset position: Winston shot John and John fell downstairs. If he is a good person at this time, he knocked john downstairs because john fell downstairs and died for nine years, while upstairs, he would die for ten years. As for whether John can live or not, it's really not for him to decide. If it weren't for him to postpone for an hour and John died as soon as he left the hotel, he would have done his best to do this with these two films. If he is black at this time, it would be that John chose to jump off the building to survive. There is nothing to say. But it is also easy to understand: it was love to help you in the first place, but now it is duty to kill you.
Don't forget what the theme of this film is, "cause and effect" and "rules". Because you did that before, you can only do it now. You plant a cause and reap huge consequences. If you break the rules, you're fucking over. You have no ability, don't break the rules. Although the plot of this film is very simple and brainless, it is not so rubbish and mentally retarded as you think, OK?
————————————
5.20: Hey! The Hong Kong old Chinese doctor is actually the keysmith in "The Matrix 2"! And he is also the voice of the tortoise master in the "Kung Fu Panda" series! I haven't seen anyone else point this out, and I suspect that there are probably more Matrix stalks no one has unearthed.
View more about John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum reviews
