For the ending of this film, I believe many people are very upset; what I want to say is that if the ending is a little clearer, it can reach the level of 5 stars; so the last ten minutes determine whether it is 4 stars or 5 stars.
I have a lot of doubts about this film, and I slowly said:
Fatty was overpowered at home at the beginning and was basically unable to fight back. This contradicts the news revealed in the tunnel later, and the contradiction is very big; if Fatty Is a "spy" working for the government (that wretched brother said: "Spy? We are all spies") that corresponding training, grappling and fighting ability is definitely not so weak, a baseball bat can KO, otherwise this A "brain"-level figure of "think tank type" is caught by the enemy for interrogation, isn't it just a move? And this kind of people who understand state secrets (do things for the country) are not equipped with security measures? Dedicated monitoring and protection? Well, even without protection, it was incredibly weak at the beginning, because until the tunnel section revealed the news, I still thought that fat brother was self-taught in the ten years after the loss of his wife. That might be more convincing.
Furthermore, if such a big incident happened, the judges and many government officials died, wouldn't the White House be alarmed? If there is a political rivalry, Fat Brother is not even a supporter? The power of the media is zero in this film (for the fat man), and for the group of prosecutors who are standing on the opposite side, the media is suddenly powerful again (the black female prosecutor said that the media can now eat us). According to common sense, even if it’s just a suspect, it should be a 24-hour CAM monitoring person to guard the isolation cell, etc. (It should have been transferred to the federal prison; but here I thought, the fat guy is like a god, how do you know? Will he be locked up in that prison? Wouldn't all the prisons in that state have dug tunnels?)
If the fat man worked for the government, he didn't find a relationship to fix the two before the sentence was pronounced for the murder of his wife? At first it didn't seem that Fat Man had to torture the two men, he was forced to take revenge by Black Jamie's deal.
In fact, the director always tries to focus the audience's attention on the operation of the judicial system, thereby ignoring or even distorting many details. Robbery, rape and murder, DNA can't be convicted? Bloody knife? Fat brother has spent millions in litigation, but he actually needs to make a deal? Anyone who finds a gold medal lawyer can handle this kind of hard case.
Let's talk about the problem of role switching. What I first saw was a man at home, a weak but convincing "engineer", a so-called "good guy"; Black Jamie was a dirty lawyer and a "bad guy" behind the scenes; Ten years later, the "bad guy" Black Jamie had a child, and the "good guy" fat brother became the "chainsaw" version of 007 mad murder. At this time we still think that fat guy is a "good guy", we still have to look at Heijie How can Mi, the "bad guy" rack our brains to deal with it; otherwise, why do we waste time and waste electricity so entangled? Don't pretend to be literary petty bourgeoisie to teach the audience to "rise to a new height and level to think", I just try to relax. At this time, the fat guy slowly became philosophically like a martyr, and the director was still trying to switch the roles of both sides, resulting in the appearance that some people who died later were not worthy of death; and the damned ones are always immortal (Black Jamie) What is fat guy doing? Sermon? In the education industry? If Fat Brother is fighting the judicial system (well the director is as you wish), is it useful to just educate Black Jamie? In that way, you should leave the blonde beauty (because the beauty is more plastic and educative) and kill the black Jamie who has been corrupted in pursuit of high conviction rate.
At the end, all I saw was that it seemed as if no one had taken advantage of it; Jamie Black became the hero who saved a large number of people? A bunch of good people (or bad people? I don’t know how to tell) who represent the interests of the government who wanted to make a fat brother survived? Didn't the extremely clever tactician like Fat Brother anticipate that the bomb would return to his cell? what the fu3k? Why the fu3k fat brother is going back to the cell? Can't you go back and stay where the bomb exploded? At the moment when the walls are burning, Fatty looks like a lost villain defeated by a clever controversial hero? Black Jamie asked him if he really wanted to do this. Such obvious and emboldened behavior characteristics, Fat Brother, the tactician did not expect? Fuck me to death, I don't believe it. And I don't know which party Black Jamie and the wretched police officer represented in the end. Director, do you want a thought-provoking effect? doesn't work here! So much nonsense is just one question: Can you answer me whether the good guys won or the bad guys won? Who is the good guy and who is the bad guy? (Oh being confused is two questions)
Fat brother wants to "overturn the entire system", so is his idea evil or justice? He didn't seem to be able to succeed at the end, didn't he, he didn't die, so does the expression on his face indicate that Jamie is the righteous party? I only saw a-climax-tide-even-even-the tragic end of the vengeance that fell short in the end; the director, you want us to think, then the result is that we should not revenge-revenge-society-will?
At first, I wanted to ask who was operating the sturdy explosion-proof robot in the cemetery. Later, I realized that the fat guy might be the remote control, so this is not a flaw. Fat guy is so tired. He got out of the prison and made cell phone bombs, car bombs, graveyard killers, and a whole blasting expert.
There are still a lot of questions left for the guys who built the building. I was so stunned that I couldn’t figure it out and didn’t want to watch the movie again; I just said that Fat Brother’s ability to pick movies needs to be improved. The live-action game has something in common with this movie. Yes: The ending is bad. The difference is: the live-action game rots in the last 5 minutes, leaving you in a state of tremor, full of blood, and then turned into an angry state. The anger value is as high as 200%; the law-abiding citizen rots in the last 10 minutes, making you entangled and thinking, At least the first half an hour to kill those bad people is very enjoyable, so forget it.
View more about Law Abiding Citizen reviews
