Chernobyl, this is basically a terrifying existence in common sense.
"Nuclear power plant" has since become a technology of "discreet talk".
Many people died, more sequelae...
A series of numbers.
Regarding this point, how does Lao Maozi himself see this issue? This may be a different angle.
Lao Maozi's pain point, which is "secret as deep", can now be talked about by myself, which is not a small improvement. However, perhaps it is because nowadays, Lao Maozi doesn't have too many taboos about "unspeakable".
Therefore, in the story, the "representative" still "outspokenly" said "you don't know how the bureaucracy works".
When problems occur, bureaucrats are already thinking about how to eliminate the influence, how to guide public opinion, and how to protect themselves.
"National interest" is the first prerequisite. If you have any doubts, please "don't be too childish."
So when this scientist was "childish", he was well warned.
However, the scientist naturally has the backbone of a scientist and asked "I am the child of the motherland".
This sentence of anti-kill is quite relieved, but it doesn't help.
You should grow up when you should grow up.
The Chernobyl incident is undoubtedly a "man-made disaster", but such a "man-made disaster" could have been avoided. It was only because "we allowed it to be built like this" that it became a "man-made disaster".
This "man-made disaster" is huge, but it is definitely not the "biggest", even except for war.
Perhaps, this is just a "great joy" performance. Just like the story, the catastrophe has come, but the above is considering whether it will affect the May 1st carnival.
When catastrophe occurs, sacrifice is inevitable.
Several of the "key people" in it performed differently. Although the above "needs" are offensive, the "needs" of one's conscience always make choices.
The colonel in the story is considered to be of high rank. At the critical moment, he chose not to let the soldiers go, but chose to go to battle himself.
Because they can't use the name of "volunteer" to ask others.
This is quite confusing.
Important people have important arrangements, how can they give up their important positions lightly?
Looking back at the protagonist of the story, the purpose is not so noble.
From the beginning of the story, it can be seen that this guy is a "liberal", a natural prodigal son, and never wants to stay quietly in one place and accept an unchanging life.
However, because of his son, he was "forced" to choose to face the disaster.
Foreigners don't like to describe such a tall character. The hero is also flawed and makes people feel more real, although the beginning of the story shows that the characters are purely fictional.
At the end of the story, it's a bit of an understatement.
The male protagonist traded her life for the opportunity. In order to show the "forgiveness of love", the female protagonist took off her protective clothing and lay with the male protagonist. This always feels a bit weird.
The power of "nuclear radiation" has been weakened. After the catastrophe, they finally lived happily.
This doesn't seem to be in line with common sense, maybe it's Lao Maozi's whitewashing.
Today, it may no longer be the age of "talking about nuclear discoloration", but if we maintain enough awe of technology, we may be able to keep going.
Just pray that the following situation will never happen again.
The content will not be translated. The subtitle group in the movie is a close-up.
In addition to these, some tidbits are quite interesting.
This scene of lining up for hair is quite happy. It feels that since that era, Lao Maozi has been "invaded" by the West.
This is unstoppable.
Stallone and Schwarzenegger have also entered into chaos.
And who is more resistant to beating than Bruce Lee, this answer is answered by Jackie Chan.
View more about Chernobyl: Abyss reviews
