Make a technical discussion on the murder method of the plastic bag murderer

Jakob 2022-01-22 08:05:41

I will not discuss other issues, but just want to raise some personal questions about the male protagonist's killing methods in the film, and everyone will discuss it.
As far as I understand, the male protagonist should be a person with super high IQ, extremely calm, and all actions based on strict logic. However, for just such an S-level perverted murderer, is the killing method too simple and rude, the production power is unreasonably high, and the suspect can be cleaned unreasonably.
He can skillfully attack people with plastic bags, and then create confusing scenes. But wouldn't the stunned blow leave a mark? Some people who have completely disappeared are fine, but like Diaojing, have the police accepted the suicide theory so frankly?
Killing is not necessarily difficult, but handling dead bodies is very troublesome. In order to cover up the accidental killing, he thought of using a massacre to cover up a corpse. Although in the end I still felt that there was a certain unnatural gap between the massacre and the female students who committed suicide because of the harassment, but I have to say that the whole plan is already a very clever plan. But why the massacre happened? The reason was that he was seen when he retreated after killing. This incident shows one of the most incomprehensible aspects of his murder tactics: He basically doesn't shy away from committing crimes, and he didn't seem to have encountered any trouble before.
In many detective novels, the murderer tried his best to create a puzzle, just to fabricate an alibi. However, the male protagonist brazenly commits crimes in densely populated areas all year round, without considering the risk of identity exposure.
First, when killing a black colleague and female teacher in the prologue, he directly carried a plastic bag and ran to someone's house to start work. Wouldn't it be captured by the camera? What if someone sees it in the corridor? After watching this film, I watched it when I went out. There are cameras in the corridors of such a broken tube building.
Second, if the water at the door of someone's house is replaced with oil, won't it be captured by the camera? Shouldn't modern cities have cameras all over the city? I still have the same question, what should I do if I see it by the neighbourhood?
Third, the method of killing fishing wells in the subway is clean and neat. But what if the sleeping uncle wakes up? What if someone gets in the car when you get off? And most importantly, the camera in the subway...
Fourth, he abused Kyusuke and tied them up directly in the classroom. How can he avoid everyone's eyes and ears? The passing female classmates are already very thrilling. How does the male lead deal with the teachers and students after the meeting? Even if you hid Keisuke during the meeting, is the whole school empty? Wouldn't you be hit by someone in the corridor or office? Also, why are there no cameras in the school... (You are always entangled with cameras for Mao!!!)
Well, the United States is the norm of modern civil liberties, and Japan is a model of East Asian democracy and rule of law. They have never used cameras to interfere with public life. Of freedom.
Fifth, is he so sure that his little lover will not talk to his girlfriends about their personal affair? Is he so sure that Polygonum will not tell others that they are out for a drink? In the experience of ordinary people, it is feasible to keep any social activities within a small area, but it is almost impossible to isolate anyone other than the two. After Tiaojing and Keisuke discussed this issue, as long as they talked about this topic with anyone else, the male protagonist would get into trouble. (In fact, the friends of Keisuke in the campus massacre didn't trust the male lead from the beginning because Keisuke had discussed this with them.)
Some people might say that it was not seen by others. Isn't it because these Xiaosao Nian didn't tell others about it. If a habitual murderer wants to keep himself out of suspicion for a long time, he must have a full grasp of the murder plan. Such a reckless murder actually carries a very high risk. Being touched by someone after killing Mine and unable to retreat safely is actually a very typical risk accident, which may happen in any previous crime. In fact, the plan this time was relatively reliable. As a result, there was an accident (and it was just a retreat instead of being seen during the assault), and it could only be covered by the Blood Slaughter Campus. Once the risk is exposed, he will rely on more killings to make up. According to this idea, the ripple effect will continue to spread. Before he returns to Japan to cause campus tragedies, New York is about to be wiped out by him for seven or eight blocks.
In my concept, it is very troublesome to get acquitted after a murder, but the male protagonist does it very easily, and it seems that there is no need to consider complicated methods, and the police will not doubt him. Could it be that he has been killing the field for more than ten years and staying out of the matter innocently, is it just luck? ? ?
I haven't read the original work, and I don't know if there will be a more logical explanation in the text. I would like to ask you all here. I hope that the experts from all walks of life will not hesitate to enlighten me. Someday, whoever understands it to me, I will be able to take the plastic bag to our department manager's house to sit and sit (Hello~~~~~~)

View more about Lesson of the Evil reviews