immortal

Laurie 2022-04-22 07:01:49

Watching it for Zola was like watching a foreign movie in the 1930s for the first time. After all, the background is in France, and the dialogue and newspapers and books are all in English, but it feels weird. Other than that, it's okay. I'm not very satisfied with the fact that I've been living in loneliness when I was young, became famous with "Nana", and had a friendship with Cézanne. In my opinion, a writer's biography is best to show more of his works and creations, of course, I am not saying that the Dreyfus case is not important in Zola's biography. The characters are very full, and Zola's transformation from inattentive at the beginning of the case to defending Dreyfus is very expressive. Faced with Mrs. Dreyfus' plea, Zola did not agree with righteous indignation, but hesitantly, because Dreyfus, who stood up and publicly defended the crime at that time with "iron-proof evidence", was a terrible thing and must give up. As a well-known writer, he has all the fame and honor, but he finally made the choice to fight for justice and wrote the "I accuse" that has been handed down through the ages. The courage and selflessness are vividly reflected, which is a greatness worth remembering for future generations. act of righteousness.

Gregorio 2022-04-23 07:04:07

I saw it a long time ago, I forgot