View more about Wuthering Heights reviews
untitled
Jason 2022-01-19 08:02:25
The fundamental difference from the 2009 director Kochi Gilzo is the cloud and mud! To put it nicely: The film is full of things that break traditional cognition, with handheld cameras, natural light and first-person perspectives, bold and ambitious. It's hard to say: Don't expect to see the elegant Britain, here you can only see the muddy pits outside the dilapidated villa, constant rainstorms, and cattle and sheep trembling in the rain. . . I am embarrassed to admit that it is the world of villas and farmers, and the clothes are not as good as beggars. The so-called gentlemen are just rash men one by one. It completely broke all my expectations of Wuthering Heights!
Extended Reading
-
Deondre 2022-03-19 09:01:08
No soundtrack, natural light and handheld art is avant-garde art? This still is much better than the movie itself. Not to mention true love. I don’t even see the race. The best performer is the little Heathcliff. Several adults are even awkward. No spark
-
Clementina 2022-03-16 09:01:07
In fact, you don’t need to watch this version. Kaya's shots are pitiful. During the period, I was impatient and brushed my scarf~
-
Older Heathcliff: Don't leave me here where I can't find you.
-
[last lines]
Young Cathy: I am Heathcliff.