If a mirror is truly extraordinary, isn't montage a joke?

Cyrus 2022-03-21 09:01:09

As we all know, a movie is the art of editing. A movie that has lost its editing is like a machine that has lost its lubricating oil. It runs dry.

Editing can make the movie jump arbitrarily in time and place. Lost a shot of editing is obviously dead at a given time and place by a side of the lens, and the expressive power is very limited.

What's interesting is that Mendes was born as a theater director. This mirror is very similar to the coherent presentation on the theater stage! After all, a mirror is limited by the coherent lens, while the theater stage is limited by the location, and they all need the same continuous and uninterrupted presentation to complete the performance. The drama also has the ability to switch scenes and advance time between the scenes. In contrast, the film has a higher requirement for continuity. In this film, the location can still advance with the lens, and the acceleration of time is indeed unsolvable before the end of the lens. In the interval when Schofield was stunned, the director had to stop the camera to advance the timeline. The director can shorten the distance for a single shot, but we cannot follow a shot from day to night to daytime in 120 minutes.

It has to be said that theater director Mendes needs to mobilize time and characters more finely than ordinary film directors. In the end, a single shot theoretically requires a successful performance once. This requires multiple rehearsals like a drama rehearsal to familiarize yourself with the process, rather than slowly running in like in ordinary film shooting.

However, the plot in the film really paid too much to serve a shot, some had to be post-produced into seemingly uninterrupted shots, and there were characters who forcibly entered the shots immediately, causing many places to look very blunt.

In addition to some actors who need to refer to the theater method for scheduling on and off the stage, Mendes also retained some dramatic elements in the film's light and shadow processing. The unprovoked scene of a large number of incendiary bombs continuously burning made the entire ruined city in a very strong light ratio. The flickering and flickering of the light brings a strong dramatic effect, just like the strong appeal of drama on the stage.

Fortunately, Mendes has Diggins to help out. Only a theater director and a master photographer can make this seemingly excellent film in the end. 1917 is a good look. The sense of substitution brought by a single mirror is like the audience itself is crossing many obstacles to clear the customs, but with such a strong production team, I believe that this movie will not be better after a single mirror, which is brought by montage. The emotional turn and experience must be better.

This is a reversing movie in movie history.

View more about 1917 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Olen 2022-03-22 09:01:08

    It feels like the shoot is broken, the level of wilderness hunter, Mendes walked a very narrow road, it is like the son of Sol in Cannes a few years ago, paying too much attention to the psychological state of the character, and there are many descriptions of various nuances. , Almost completely ignored the shaping of the world view. The hero charged forward with the obsession of completing a task, a story that needed reflection, but there was no room for thinking. But even so, the director did not use surrealist techniques to construct an inner world into the history of the mind, so in the end, you can only do it, just look at it. The true recording function of the long lens becomes a pure spectacle. The second half of the show is a bit like a pot cover, and it is also a work that the two masters have worked together. Several plots are written quite vulgar. The ending is too beautiful, if it is not too high, it should be given 4 stars.

  • Tatyana 2022-03-24 09:01:10

    At least 8.5 points (wait to see the IMAX version to evaluate). I have a hunch that this film will be the biggest winner of the Oscars. The four items of best photography, best sound effects, best sound mixing, and best soundtrack are stable. This film vividly reflects how a highly mature film industry system can create all-round high-quality masterpieces, but it is also precisely because the film pursues the ultimate in technology (due to the excellent and innovative photography, it is easy to watch the film. Distracted to think about how a certain shot was taken!) It seems that there is inevitably a compromise in terms of art. The plot description and role modeling are relatively thin, but overall it is still quite good. Here we should invite Director Ang Lee. Deeply reflect on how I fell into the dilemma of pursuing technology and giving up art. After watching IMAX, maintain a score of 8.5. Due to the weak plot of the film, there is no suspense about the plot after watching it before, which weakens the overall appeal of the film. The technical blessing of the big screen can only just offset the weakening caused by this spoiler. The sound mix is ​​great, I can tell, but I don’t think there is enough space for the soundtrack. [Cloud Gate Meiya] The first part after the epidemic!

1917 quotes

  • Lance Corporal Blake: [Schofield and Blake are in the underground German billet] Bloody hell! Even their rats are bigger than ours.

  • Captain Smith: I'm sorry about your friend. May I tell you something you probably already know. It doesn't do to dwell on it.

    Lance Corporal Schofield: No, sir.