But to be honest, the viewing process was full of ups and downs, the suspenseful design was successful, the suspenseful design was successful, the warmth was tearful, and the dramatic scenes did not lack philosophical depth. Of course, I like these characters in Harry Potter and I like them. Some of the themes represented, so when the protagonist in this episode is finally able to confidently express his views and solve the key problems of the plot point (still under the influence of the magic potion), I can feel that the whole work pays attention to the growth of the characters , There is considerable depth.
At the same time, I'm very disappointed with the director's plan to treat the last three HPs as a three-piece mini series. The movie must be a single episode within two hours, and it must be well done like "Lord of the Rings". This one is poorly done. The portrayal of Snape and Malfroy is so thin that he dare not use pen and ink to change the final alignment of the characters because of the ease of use of the final ending. But in fact-who would remember what happened in this movie at that time? If those details are not used in this episode, how can the audience really take it seriously? Doing so can only reduce the appreciation of the episode, but it can't increase the depth of the future story.
Another most fatal weakness is that the director seems to have deliberately added a strong bright color to the style of the story, and did not plan the plot around the dark nature of the main line of the story of this episode, thus adding soap operas to interfere with the audiovisual. Such a mixed “tone” of the story is not impossible, but must be relevant. For example, the success of the Lord of the Rings lies in naming Frodo that his carefree pastoral life is at stake, and he must carry it. The Demon World embarks on a journey. As a result, those descriptions of pastoral life increase the hero's mission and risk-taking-once it fails, the pleasant time, the possibility of love, and the peaceful future will be destroyed. And in this episode, it seems that in the easy stage, everyone is experiencing amnesia; even when Dumbledore died, no one seemed to dare to translate the death of the leader of the resistance organization into a haze of future fate—and the facts (It should be revealed in this episode) That's it.
But I know that this is not director incompetence. Quite the opposite—the director and the entire decision-making team’s wisdom decides:
1. It is necessary to seduce audiences all over the world to watch the last two episodes of HP to the greatest extent, so the plot of this episode cannot be complete, but to continue the suspenseful foreshadowing. Just like the latter two episodes of "Pirates of the Caribbean."
2. It is necessary to ensure the impartiality of the PG (note that as long as you are an individual, you can watch it), and the proportion of darkness must be greatly reduced. The so-called difficult to adjust, that is the case. If it is filmed in the tone of "The Seven Deadly Sins", it must be There will be rave reviews, but there will be frequent disputes at the box office. If you look at other PG's works, you should know that this classification must take care of the children's IQ and EQ, and the audience must make sacrifices.
Although I dismiss this practice and think it lacks the dignity of an artist, after all, living in the world requires more than allegiance to the truth—just like Potter has to constantly torture the unspeakable Dumbledore and drink the bitter water. The value of a person lies in his ability to surpass his own intuitive feelings and understanding, and to serve more people. Dumbledore used his great wisdom to understand that his life can be measured rationally, so he would give it out selflessly. He asked and hoped that not only Potter could understand it.
The recognized shortcomings include excessive soap in movies and no climax; scattered plots and lack of main lines; especially lack of core story content, which is very thin.
But to be honest, the viewing process was full of ups and downs, the suspenseful design was successful, the suspenseful design was successful, the warmth was tearful, and the dramatic scenes did not lack philosophical depth. Of course, I like these characters in Harry Potter and I like them. Some of the themes represented, so when the protagonist in this episode is finally able to confidently express his views and solve the key problems of the plot point (still under the influence of the magic potion), I can feel that the whole work pays attention to the growth of the characters , There is considerable depth.
At the same time, I'm very disappointed with the director's plan to treat the last three HPs as a three-piece mini series. The movie must be a single episode within two hours, and it must be well done like "Lord of the Rings". This one is poorly done. The portrayal of Snape and Malfroy is so thin that he dare not use pen and ink to change the final alignment of the characters because of the ease of use of the final ending. But in fact-who would remember what happened in this movie at that time? If those details are not used in this episode, how can the audience really take it seriously? Doing so can only reduce the appreciation of the episode, but it can't increase the depth of the future story.
Another most fatal weakness is that the director seems to have deliberately added a strong bright color to the style of the story, and did not plan the plot around the dark nature of the main line of the story of this episode, thus adding soap operas to interfere with the audiovisual. Such a mixed “tone” of the story is not impossible, but must be relevant. For example, the success of the Lord of the Rings lies in naming Frodo that his carefree pastoral life is at stake, and he must carry it. The Demon World embarks on a journey. As a result, those descriptions of pastoral life increase the hero's mission and risk-taking-once it fails, the pleasant time, the possibility of love, and the peaceful future will be destroyed. And in this episode, it seems that in the easy stage, everyone is experiencing amnesia; even when Dumbledore died, no one seemed to dare to translate the death of the leader of the resistance organization into a haze of future fate—and the facts (It should be revealed in this episode) That's it.
But I know that this is not director incompetence. On the contrary-the wisdom of the director and the entire decision team decides:
1. Must seduce audiences all over the world to watch the last two episodes of HP to the greatest extent, so the plot of this episode cannot be complete, but to continue the suspenseful foreshadowing. Just like the latter two episodes of "Pirates of the Caribbean."
2. It is necessary to ensure the impartiality of the PG (note that as long as you are an individual, you can watch it), and the proportion of darkness must be greatly reduced. The so-called difficult to adjust, that is the case. If it is filmed in the tone of "The Seven Deadly Sins", it must be There will be rave reviews, but there will be frequent disputes at the box office. If you look at other PG's works, you should know that this classification must take care of the children's IQ and EQ, and the audience must make sacrifices.
Although I dismiss this practice and think it lacks the dignity of an artist, after all, living in the world requires more than allegiance to the truth—just like Potter has to constantly torture the unspeakable Dumbledore and drink the bitter water. The value of a person lies in his ability to surpass his own intuitive feelings and understanding, and to serve more people. Dumbledore used his great wisdom to understand that his life can be measured rationally, so he would give it out selflessly. He asked and hoped that not only Potter could understand it.
View more about Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince reviews
