It didn't take long before the film started that the murderer was not a criminal with high intelligence who wanted to provoke society, but just a pervert. However, hope appeared again and again, and again and again failed. As time went by, the news that made a sensation in the society became uninterested. There were fewer and fewer people around the cartoonist, and the cartoonist became more and more lonely when investigating the case; of course, the more this is the case, the more he can show his perseverance. .
Why are you so persistent? In fact, the murderer is not a murderer who makes people afraid of hearing his name, and his methods are not clever. But he had no motive for committing the crime, so it was impossible to investigate. In the film, several attempts were made to find the pattern of the murderer's crimes, but none of them were foreshadowing, and they were not mentioned later. Several magical characters also appeared to tell police detectives and reporters about the murderer, but it was useless.
When I first found Leigh, all the details were in line, only the handwriting could not be determined. But it was the handwriting that brought the whole case to a deadlock (the United States is really a country with strict laws... It's just that this rigor is not built on rigorous premises). Later, several suspects appeared, and they were unable to continue because there was no direct evidence. When the cartoonist finds more details, the detective can only say, write it into a book. There is no legal way, so let the public opinion think of a way. Sure enough, the survivor who saw the murderer's face came back and identified the murderer-I was speechless when I saw it-that's it, why didn't you let the two patrols recognize the face when you doubted Leigh?
The most troublesome thing is that there are too many names and place names, and many of them are very close; the time is also very chaotic, and several years, months and days are intertwined. This made me completely ignorant of the names, place names, and logical reasoning in the dialogue when I saw later. In other words, I don’t understand at all—is this the so-called "high IQ"?
View more about Zodiac reviews
