It seems to be possible to conclude that the root of rational crime is always the division of hatred between man and man. For example, the influence of the original family on people's childhood, the inferiority complex in getting along with the opposite sex, the hatred of the partner, etc.; the so-called natural criminals are mostly the differentiation of sexual perversions, such as foot fetishes, so they completely transfer their sexual needs to specific ones. things, and no longer have humane thoughts about man himself. But most of them are roots left over from childhood or adolescence. For example, I think I am a better self, I think I have been unfairly treated and my better personality has been destroyed, so this is my own crime. The reason is that I am the victim, I don't think I am guilty, the root of the crime is buried by others and even the society. This of course makes sense. For example, Holden's arrogance and complacency after he was despised and his career was hindered and accumulated, and then he had a vengeful hatred for others after he succeeded in finding his own way. Crime can be said to amplify the results of desire and hatred, or impulse.
Talking with people and even interrogation requires finding common topics, using common language, and maintaining an equal attitude, such as properly switching between arms crossed and body leaning forward to slightly sideways and arms extended, and fabrication of established facts, such as claiming that there are witnesses (Holden used it twice); looking for weaknesses in others through behavioral profiling (determining criminal minds based on crime scenes and personality traits).
Although it sounds powerful, in fact, the efficiency of behavioral profiling should be very low. One of the major regrets of the show is that the conversation with the criminal did not yield very systematic information, so the big question of the cause and factor of the crime from beginning to end could not be answered.
In addition, the foreshadowing of the bearded man in park city and the dark line of the foot fetish principal were all gone in the first season. The plot of Wendy and the cat is a bit suspicious; it really wants to force me to watch the first episode. Is the second season QAQ
To sum up, the plot is not very full, but the portrayal of the criminal is still very complete, and the motive for the crime has not been really solved, which is a little disappointing.
PS Holden reminds me of Sheldon.
View more about Mindhunter reviews
