This is mainly to discuss the essence of life is COMEDY? Or TRADY? The idea of the film is clever. Under the same premise, through the radically different advancements of comedy writers and tragic writers, completely different endings were born. Although this is only a hypothesis, the chain effect and the step-by-step development of the story are very likely to find real-life examples. After reading it, I have a question in my mind, what is the primary factor in determining whether life is COMEDY or TRADY? Woody Allen doesn't discuss this in the film, and ends up offering theories like "living in the moment".
Think about it, if I were the heroine in that hypothetical story, what would the ending be like? The ending of COMEDY OR TRADY seems to be related to the protagonist's optimistic or pessimistic attitude towards life. But will the optimist have a COMEDY ending? Or are pessimists doomed to TRADY in the end? Are the criteria for judging whether life is COMEDY or TRADY a subjective personal opinion or an objective social measure?
OH~ Enough questions for Woody Allen to make another movie!
View more about Melinda and Melinda reviews
